linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 10 (warning: objtool: ___bpf_prog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:46:15 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 10 (warning: objtool: ___bpf_prog_run())

On 4/9/20 8:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The merge window has opened, so please do not add any material for the
> next release into your linux-next included trees/branches until after
> the merge window closes.
> 
> Changes since 20200409:
> 

Hi Josh,

In an x86_64 kernel built with FRAME_POINTER=y and UNWINDER_ORC not set,
do we care about this warning?

kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: ___bpf_prog_run()+0x33: call without frame pointer save/setup


thanks.
-- 
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>