linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coresight: tmc: Read TMC mode only when TMC hw is enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1751aeabd22bee18d2eef0f643883265@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:55:30 +0530
From:   Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc:     mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, mike.leach@...aro.org,
        swboyd@...omium.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: tmc: Read TMC mode only when TMC hw is enabled

Hi Suzuki,

On 2020-04-13 04:47, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Sai,
> 
> On 04/09/2020 12:35 PM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>> Reading TMC mode register in tmc_read_prepare_etb without
>> enabling the TMC hardware leads to async exceptions like
>> the one in the call trace below. This can happen if the
>> user tries to read the TMC etf data via device node without
>> setting up source and the sink first which enables the TMC
>> hardware in the path. So make sure that the TMC is enabled
>> before we try to read TMC data.
> 
> So, one can trigger the same SError by simply :
> 
> $ cat /sys/bus/coresight/device/tmc_etb0/mgmt/mode
> 

I do not see any SError when I run the above command.

localhost ~ # cat /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tmc_etf0/mgmt/mode
0x0

And this is most likely due to

commit cd9e3474bb793dc ("coresight: add PM runtime calls to 
coresight_simple_func()")

> And also :
> 
>> 
>>   Kernel panic - not syncing: Asynchronous SError Interrupt
>>   CPU: 7 PID: 2605 Comm: hexdump Tainted: G S                5.4.30 
>> #122
>>   Call trace:
>>    dump_backtrace+0x0/0x188
>>    show_stack+0x20/0x2c
>>    dump_stack+0xdc/0x144
>>    panic+0x168/0x36c
>>    panic+0x0/0x36c
>>    arm64_serror_panic+0x78/0x84
>>    do_serror+0x130/0x138
>>    el1_error+0x84/0xf8
>>    tmc_read_prepare_etb+0x88/0xb8
>>    tmc_open+0x40/0xd8
>>    misc_open+0x120/0x158
>>    chrdev_open+0xb8/0x1a4
>>    do_dentry_open+0x268/0x3a0
>>    vfs_open+0x34/0x40
>>    path_openat+0x39c/0xdf4
>>    do_filp_open+0x90/0x10c
>>    do_sys_open+0x150/0x3e8
>>    __arm64_compat_sys_openat+0x28/0x34
>>    el0_svc_common+0xa8/0x160
>>    el0_svc_compat_handler+0x2c/0x38
>>    el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x10
>> 
>> Fixes: 4525412a5046 ("coresight: tmc: making prepare/unprepare 
>> functions generic")
>> Reported-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c | 5 +++++
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h | 1 +
>>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c 
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c
>> index 1cf82fa58289..7bae69748ab7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c
>> @@ -62,11 +62,13 @@ void tmc_flush_and_stop(struct tmc_drvdata 
>> *drvdata)
>>     void tmc_enable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>   {
>> +	drvdata->enable = true;
>>   	writel_relaxed(TMC_CTL_CAPT_EN, drvdata->base + TMC_CTL);
>>   }
>>     void tmc_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>   {
>> +	drvdata->enable = false;
>>   	writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + TMC_CTL);
>>   }
>>   @@ -102,6 +104,9 @@ static int tmc_read_prepare(struct tmc_drvdata 
>> *drvdata)
>>   {
>>   	int ret = 0;
>>   +	if (!drvdata->enable)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
> 
> Does this check always guarantee that the TMC is enabled when
> we actually get to reading the MODE ? This needs to be done
> under the spinlock.
> 

Ok I will make this change.

Thanks,
Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation