| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cdcdb710-1d78-6fac-48d7-35519ddcdc6a@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:48:22 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, tj@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com,
khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com, willy@...radead.org,
shakeelb@...gle.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
swkhack <swkhack@...il.com>,
"Potyra, Stefan" <Stefan.Potyra@...ktrobit.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock
> In a previous review, I pointed out the following race condition
> between page charging and compaction:
>
> compaction: generic_file_buffered_read:
>
> page_cache_alloc()
>
> !PageBuddy()
>
> lock_page_lruvec(page)
> lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec()
> spin_lock(&lruvec->lru_lock)
> if lruvec != mem_cgroup_page_lruvec()
> goto again
>
> add_to_page_cache_lru()
> mem_cgroup_commit_charge()
> page->mem_cgroup = foo
> lru_cache_add()
> __pagevec_lru_add()
> SetPageLRU()
>
> if PageLRU(page):
> __isolate_lru_page()
>
> As far as I can see, you have not addressed this. You have added
> lock_page_memcg(), but that prevents charged pages from moving between
> cgroups, it does not prevent newly allocated pages from being charged.
>
> It doesn't matter how many times you check the lruvec before and after
> locking - if you're looking at a free page, it might get allocated,
> charged and put on a new lruvec after you're done checking, and then
> you isolate a page from an unlocked lruvec.
>
> You simply cannot serialize on page->mem_cgroup->lruvec when
> page->mem_cgroup isn't stable. You need to serialize on the page
> itself, one way or another, to make this work.
>
>
> So here is a crazy idea that may be worth exploring:
>
> Right now, pgdat->lru_lock protects both PageLRU *and* the lruvec's
> linked list.
>
> Can we make PageLRU atomic and use it to stabilize the lru_lock
> instead, and then use the lru_lock only serialize list operations?
>
> I.e. in compaction, you'd do
>
> if (!TestClearPageLRU(page))
> goto isolate_fail;
> /*
> * We isolated the page's LRU state and thereby locked out all
> * other isolators, including cgroup page moving, page reclaim,
> * page freeing etc. That means page->mem_cgroup is now stable
> * and we can safely look up the correct lruvec and take the
> * page off its physical LRU list.
> */
> lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page);
> spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
> del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, page_lru(page));
>
> Putback would mostly remain the same (although you could take the
> PageLRU setting out of the list update locked section, as long as it's
> set after the page is physically linked):
>
> /* LRU isolation pins page->mem_cgroup */
> lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page)
> spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
> add_page_to_lru_list(...);
> spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
>
> SetPageLRU(page);
>
> And you'd have to carefully review and rework other sites that rely on
> PageLRU: reclaim, __page_cache_release(), __activate_page() etc.
>
> Especially things like activate_page(), which used to only check
> PageLRU to shuffle the page on the LRU list would now have to briefly
> clear PageLRU and then set it again afterwards.
>
> However, aside from a bit more churn in those cases, and the
> unfortunate additional atomic operations, I currently can't think of a
> fundamental reason why this wouldn't work.
>
> Hugh, what do you think?
>
Hi Johannes
As to the idea of TestClearPageLRU, we except the following scenario
compaction commit_charge
if (TestClearPageLRU)
!TestClearPageLRU lock_page_lruvec
goto isolate_fail; del_from_lru_list
unlock_page_lruvec
But there is a difficult situation to handle:
compaction commit_charge
TestClearPageLRU
!TestClearPageLRU
page possible state:
a, reclaiming, b, moving between lru list, c, migrating, like in compaction
d, mlocking, e, split_huge_page,
If the page lru bit was cleared in commit_charge with lrucare,
we still have no idea if the page was isolated by the reason from a~e
or the page is never on LRU, to deal with different reasons is high cost.
So as to the above issue you mentioned, Maybe the better idea is to
set lrucare when do mem_cgroup_commit_charge(), since the charge action
is not often. What's your idea of this solution?
Thanks
Alex
> compaction: generic_file_buffered_read:
>
> page_cache_alloc()
>
> !PageBuddy()
>
> lock_page_lruvec(page)
> lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec()
> spin_lock(&lruvec->lru_lock)
> if lruvec != mem_cgroup_page_lruvec()
> goto again
>
> add_to_page_cache_lru()
> mem_cgroup_commit_charge()
//do charge with lrucare
spin_lock(&lruvec->lru_lock)
> page->mem_cgroup = foo
> lru_cache_add()
> __pagevec_lru_add()
> SetPageLRU()
>
> if PageLRU(page):
> __isolate_lru_page()
Powered by blists - more mailing lists