| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1c5007a1-26fe-650b-0a34-5b12f749b384@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 19:03:57 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
CC: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<lkp@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [f2fs] fe1897eaa6: aim7.jobs-per-min -60.9% regression
On 2020/4/13 18:51, Feng Tang wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 11:41:46PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Greeting,
>>
>> FYI, we noticed a -60.9% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit:
>>
>>
>> commit: fe1897eaa6646f5a64a4cee0e6473ed9887d324b ("f2fs: fix to update time in lazytime mode")
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>
>> in testcase: aim7
>> on test machine: 48 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz with 64G memory
>> with following parameters:
>>
>> disk: 4BRD_12G
>> md: RAID1
>> fs: f2fs
>> test: sync_disk_rw
>> load: 200
>> cpufreq_governor: performance
>> ucode: 0x42e
>>
>> test-description: AIM7 is a traditional UNIX system level benchmark suite which is used to test and measure the performance of multiuser system.
>> test-url: https://sourceforge.net/projects/aimbench/files/aim-suite7/
>>
>>
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
>>
>>
>> Details are as below:
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
>>
>>
>> To reproduce:
>>
>> git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
>> cd lkp-tests
>> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
>> bin/lkp run job.yaml
>>
>> =========================================================================================
>> compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs/kconfig/load/md/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode:
>> gcc-7/performance/4BRD_12G/f2fs/x86_64-rhel-7.6/200/RAID1/debian-x86_64-2019-11-14.cgz/lkp-ivb-2ep1/sync_disk_rw/aim7/0x42e
>>
>> commit:
>> b145b0eb20 (" ARM and x86 bugfixes of all kinds. The most visible one is that migrating")
>> fe1897eaa6 ("f2fs: fix to update time in lazytime mode")
>>
>> b145b0eb2031a620 fe1897eaa6646f5a64a4cee0e64
>> ---------------- ---------------------------
>> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
>> | | |
>> 1:4 -25% :4 dmesg.WARNING:at#for_ip_interrupt_entry/0x
>> %stddev %change %stddev
>> \ | \
>> 1208 -60.9% 473.12 aim7.jobs-per-min
>
> Hi Chao Yu,
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> IIUC, this commit is a fix, and if you think it is necessary, we will
> stop tracking this regresion.
Hi Feng Tang,
Sorry, I missed to reply this thread.
Anyway, we need this fix patch to avoid losing atime issue in some cases,
let's stop tracking this regression please.
Thanks for noticing/reporting this regression. :)
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
> Feng
>
>
>> 992.70 +155.6% 2537 aim7.time.elapsed_time
>> 992.70 +155.6% 2537 aim7.time.elapsed_time.max
>> 1.078e+08 +60.0% 1.724e+08 aim7.time.file_system_outputs
>> 9646301 -4.2% 9238717 aim7.time.involuntary_context_switches
>> 24107 ± 3% +58.2% 38130 ± 17% aim7.time.minor_page_faults
>> 3295 +202.3% 9963 aim7.time.system_time
>> 26.75 +51.4% 40.49 aim7.time.user_time
>> 5.02e+08 +210.5% 1.559e+09 aim7.time.voluntary_context_switches
>> 9294452 ± 4% -15.7% 7835497 ± 16% numa-numastat.node0.local_node
>> 9298417 ± 4% -15.7% 7840991 ± 16% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
>> 3.66 ± 3% +4.2 7.82 ± 18% mpstat.cpu.all.idle%
>> 0.01 ± 32% -0.0 0.00 ± 31% mpstat.cpu.all.soft%
>> 0.06 -0.0 0.04 mpstat.cpu.all.usr%
>> 3.85 ± 3% +105.0% 7.89 ± 17% iostat.cpu.idle
>> 89.80 -4.9% 85.36 iostat.cpu.iowait
>> 6.29 +6.6% 6.70 iostat.cpu.system
>> 23968 -48.4% 12356 iostat.md0.w/s
>> 53780 -37.1% 33824 iostat.md0.wkB/s
>> 89.00 -4.8% 84.75 vmstat.cpu.wa
>> 53779 -37.1% 33833 vmstat.io.bo
>> 29311046 -28.6% 20935254 vmstat.memory.free
>> 1026388 +19.4% 1225080 vmstat.system.cs
>> 103289 +8.5% 112038 vmstat.system.in
>> 24013 ± 29% -58.5% 9976 ±120% numa-meminfo.node0.Dirty
>> 119019 ± 10% +44.6% 172139 ± 13% numa-meminfo.node1.Active
>> 3503 ± 56% +464.8% 19786 ± 38% numa-meminfo.node1.Active(file)
>> 40477 ± 16% -38.5% 24896 ± 47% numa-meminfo.node1.Dirty
>> 19966008 ± 2% -29.5% 14084594 ± 44% numa-meminfo.node1.MemFree
>> 13014643 ± 4% +45.2% 18896052 ± 32% numa-meminfo.node1.MemUsed
>> 12018 ± 41% +184.8% 34228 ± 35% numa-meminfo.node1.Shmem
>> 2.09e+10 +127.4% 4.752e+10 ± 4% cpuidle.C1.time
>> 2.558e+08 +140.1% 6.143e+08 ± 4% cpuidle.C1.usage
>> 3.017e+09 ± 10% +301.2% 1.211e+10 ± 9% cpuidle.C1E.time
>> 18225961 ± 9% +430.1% 96624314 ± 6% cpuidle.C1E.usage
>> 4.627e+08 ± 14% +147.5% 1.145e+09 ± 20% cpuidle.C6.time
>> 802166 ± 17% +186.9% 2301023 ± 26% cpuidle.C6.usage
>> 1.799e+10 +148.9% 4.476e+10 cpuidle.POLL.time
>> 2.616e+08 ± 2% +246.4% 9.063e+08 ± 2% cpuidle.POLL.usage
>> 6017 ± 29% -58.5% 2496 ±120% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_dirty
>> 5742 ± 29% -65.0% 2011 ±120% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_write_pending
>> 874.50 ± 56% +465.6% 4946 ± 38% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_active_file
>> 10139 ± 16% -38.6% 6224 ± 47% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_dirty
>> 4992144 ± 2% -29.5% 3521200 ± 44% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_free_pages
>> 3003 ± 41% +184.9% 8556 ± 35% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_shmem
>> 874.50 ± 56% +465.6% 4946 ± 38% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_zone_active_file
>> 9775 ± 16% -47.9% 5089 ± 47% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_zone_write_pending
>> 2.558e+08 +140.1% 6.143e+08 ± 4% turbostat.C1
>> 43.77 -4.8 38.98 ± 3% turbostat.C1%
>> 18225642 ± 9% +430.2% 96624037 ± 6% turbostat.C1E
>> 6.31 ± 10% +3.6 9.94 ± 9% turbostat.C1E%
>> 795117 ± 17% +188.4% 2292823 ± 26% turbostat.C6
>> 0.38 ± 42% -63.6% 0.14 ± 13% turbostat.CPU%c6
>> 1.028e+08 +176.7% 2.844e+08 turbostat.IRQ
>> 0.23 ± 33% -69.1% 0.07 ± 22% turbostat.Pkg%pc2
>> 275064 +12.3% 308846 ± 4% meminfo.Active
>> 8036 ± 21% +261.7% 29072 ± 52% meminfo.Active(file)
>> 64400 -45.9% 34850 meminfo.Dirty
>> 16481 +10.8% 18264 meminfo.Inactive(anon)
>> 147067 +12.8% 165858 ± 2% meminfo.KReclaimable
>> 29120417 -28.8% 20740075 meminfo.MemAvailable
>> 29335165 -28.6% 20936804 meminfo.MemFree
>> 36511133 +23.0% 44909491 meminfo.Memused
>> 147067 +12.8% 165858 ± 2% meminfo.SReclaimable
>> 36567 ± 6% +37.2% 50173 meminfo.Shmem
>> 51580 -60.8% 20220 meminfo.max_used_kB
>> 4.27 ± 7% -13.9% 3.67 ± 4% perf-stat.i.MPKI
>> 0.71 ± 3% -0.0 0.67 perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
>> 17.93 +3.5 21.41 ± 2% perf-stat.i.cache-miss-rate%
>> 1029337 +19.1% 1226025 perf-stat.i.context-switches
>> 11421 ± 4% +41.1% 16120 ± 6% perf-stat.i.cpu-migrations
>> 0.42 ± 2% +0.0 0.45 ± 6% perf-stat.i.dTLB-load-miss-rate%
>> 0.11 ± 27% -0.0 0.08 ± 3% perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
>> 84.04 ± 2% -2.3 81.75 ± 2% perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
>> 7375571 +7.3% 7917282 perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-misses
>> 3.91 ± 7% -9.2% 3.56 ± 4% perf-stat.overall.MPKI
>> 17.90 +4.1 21.96 ± 3% perf-stat.overall.cache-miss-rate%
>> 0.41 ± 2% +0.0 0.45 ± 6% perf-stat.overall.dTLB-load-miss-rate%
>> 0.10 ± 27% -0.0 0.08 ± 3% perf-stat.overall.dTLB-store-miss-rate%
>> 83.99 ± 2% -2.3 81.72 ± 2% perf-stat.overall.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
>> 1028292 +19.2% 1225532 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
>> 11410 ± 4% +41.2% 16114 ± 6% perf-stat.ps.cpu-migrations
>> 7368087 +7.4% 7914119 perf-stat.ps.iTLB-load-misses
>> 2.558e+13 ± 2% +157.0% 6.575e+13 ± 3% perf-stat.total.instructions
>> 9128 ± 2% -25.3% 6821 ± 4% slabinfo.dmaengine-unmap-16.active_objs
>> 9175 ± 2% -24.4% 6938 ± 4% slabinfo.dmaengine-unmap-16.num_objs
>> 28309 +12.5% 31840 slabinfo.f2fs_extent_node.active_objs
>> 28704 +13.0% 32429 slabinfo.f2fs_extent_node.num_objs
>> 964.00 ± 5% -13.3% 836.00 ± 6% slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.active_objs
>> 1008 ± 5% -12.7% 880.00 ± 6% slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.num_objs
>> 13017 -33.1% 8707 slabinfo.nat_entry.active_objs
>> 13036 -33.2% 8707 slabinfo.nat_entry.num_objs
>> 433.75 ± 9% +32.4% 574.50 ± 2% slabinfo.nfs_read_data.active_objs
>> 433.75 ± 9% +32.4% 574.50 ± 2% slabinfo.nfs_read_data.num_objs
>> 697.50 ± 3% +48.6% 1036 ± 33% slabinfo.numa_policy.active_objs
>> 697.50 ± 3% +48.6% 1036 ± 33% slabinfo.numa_policy.num_objs
>> 153098 +22.3% 187296 slabinfo.radix_tree_node.active_objs
>> 2733 +22.3% 3344 slabinfo.radix_tree_node.active_slabs
>> 153098 +22.3% 187296 slabinfo.radix_tree_node.num_objs
>> 2733 +22.3% 3344 slabinfo.radix_tree_node.num_slabs
>> 542.00 ± 10% +29.5% 702.00 ± 6% slabinfo.xfrm_state.active_objs
>> 542.00 ± 10% +29.5% 702.00 ± 6% slabinfo.xfrm_state.num_objs
>> 66757 +4.8% 69942 proc-vmstat.nr_active_anon
>> 2009 ± 21% +261.7% 7267 ± 52% proc-vmstat.nr_active_file
>> 96.00 +3.9% 99.75 proc-vmstat.nr_anon_transparent_hugepages
>> 13466177 +60.0% 21542226 proc-vmstat.nr_dirtied
>> 16154 -46.0% 8719 proc-vmstat.nr_dirty
>> 726643 -28.8% 517541 proc-vmstat.nr_dirty_background_threshold
>> 1455064 -28.8% 1036348 proc-vmstat.nr_dirty_threshold
>> 311402 +2.4% 318957 proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages
>> 7332853 -28.6% 5234441 proc-vmstat.nr_free_pages
>> 4120 +10.8% 4565 proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_anon
>> 13939 -1.2% 13772 proc-vmstat.nr_kernel_stack
>> 2845 -1.5% 2803 proc-vmstat.nr_page_table_pages
>> 9142 ± 6% +37.2% 12542 proc-vmstat.nr_shmem
>> 36767 +12.8% 41463 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_slab_reclaimable
>> 13387539 +60.3% 21463781 proc-vmstat.nr_written
>> 66757 +4.8% 69942 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_anon
>> 2009 ± 21% +261.7% 7267 ± 52% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_file
>> 4120 +10.8% 4565 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_anon
>> 15494 -54.2% 7089 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_write_pending
>> 582146 ±102% +628.1% 4238850 ± 6% proc-vmstat.numa_foreign
>> 13506 ± 3% +114.5% 28974 ± 31% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults
>> 8913 ± 6% +148.6% 22154 ± 35% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local
>> 582146 ±102% +628.1% 4238850 ± 6% proc-vmstat.numa_miss
>> 597885 ± 99% +611.6% 4254585 ± 6% proc-vmstat.numa_other
>> 1014174 ± 20% -46.1% 547135 ± 57% proc-vmstat.pgalloc_dma32
>> 16157005 +22.4% 19769138 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
>> 2516271 +152.8% 6360808 proc-vmstat.pgfault
>> 4866589 +64.4% 8002519 proc-vmstat.pgfree
>> 53553588 +60.3% 85856803 proc-vmstat.pgpgout
>> 1.55 ± 4% +0.1 1.65 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__schedule.schedule.io_schedule.wait_on_page_bit.f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback
>> 1.58 ± 4% +0.1 1.69 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.schedule.io_schedule.wait_on_page_bit.f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback.f2fs_wait_on_node_pages_writeback
>> 1.60 ± 4% +0.1 1.71 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.io_schedule.wait_on_page_bit.f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback.f2fs_wait_on_node_pages_writeback.f2fs_do_sync_file
>> 0.75 ± 2% +0.2 0.91 ± 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.menu_select.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary.secondary_startup_64
>> 0.70 ± 4% -0.3 0.36 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__generic_file_write_iter
>> 0.69 ± 4% -0.3 0.35 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.generic_perform_write
>> 0.57 ± 5% -0.3 0.25 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__filemap_fdatawrite_range
>> 0.58 ± 5% -0.3 0.26 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.file_write_and_wait_range
>> 0.57 ± 6% -0.3 0.25 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_writepages
>> 0.57 ± 5% -0.3 0.25 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.f2fs_write_data_pages
>> 0.64 ± 5% -0.3 0.34 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.f2fs_write_begin
>> 0.57 ± 5% -0.2 0.32 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.f2fs_put_page
>> 0.31 ± 10% -0.2 0.11 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.blk_finish_plug
>> 0.31 ± 10% -0.2 0.11 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.blk_flush_plug_list
>> 0.30 ± 11% -0.2 0.11 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.raid1_unplug
>> 0.26 -0.1 0.14 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.f2fs_write_cache_pages
>> 0.22 ± 20% -0.1 0.11 ± 41% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.brd_do_bvec
>> 0.14 ± 12% -0.1 0.03 ±100% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.submit_bio_wait
>> 0.21 ± 10% -0.1 0.11 ± 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.submit_bio
>> 0.23 ± 17% -0.1 0.13 ± 31% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.worker_thread
>> 0.20 ± 3% -0.1 0.11 ± 14% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__write_data_page
>> 0.14 ± 15% -0.1 0.05 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__submit_flush_wait
>> 0.17 ± 12% -0.1 0.09 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.md_make_request
>> 0.16 ± 11% -0.1 0.08 ± 14% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.md_handle_request
>> 0.15 ± 9% -0.1 0.07 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.raid1_make_request
>> 0.14 ± 17% -0.1 0.06 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.f2fs_issue_flush
>> 0.14 ± 6% -0.1 0.08 ± 19% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.f2fs_do_write_data_page
>> 0.10 ± 33% -0.0 0.06 ± 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.reschedule_interrupt
>> 0.09 ± 37% -0.0 0.05 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.scheduler_ipi
>> 0.06 ± 6% +0.0 0.08 ± 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.up_read
>> 0.10 ± 4% +0.0 0.12 ± 13% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.pick_next_task_idle
>> 0.20 ± 2% +0.0 0.23 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_next_timer_interrupt
>> 0.16 ± 6% +0.0 0.19 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.irq_exit
>> 0.01 ±173% +0.1 0.07 ± 7% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.put_prev_task_fair
>> 0.27 ± 3% +0.1 0.33 ± 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_next_event
>> 0.35 ± 3% +0.1 0.42 ± 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_get_sleep_length
>> 1.60 ± 4% +0.1 1.72 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.io_schedule
>> 0.78 ± 2% +0.1 0.92 ± 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.menu_select
>> 0.06 ± 6% +0.0 0.08 ± 10% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.up_read
>> 0.08 ± 5% +0.0 0.11 ± 11% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter_state
>> 0.35 ± 5% +0.0 0.39 ± 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.f2fs_wait_on_node_pages_writeback
>> 0.35 ± 4% +0.1 0.41 ± 3% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.menu_select
>> 8096 ± 28% +278.9% 30679 ± 20% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.MIN_vruntime.avg
>> 158062 ± 17% +299.5% 631442 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.MIN_vruntime.max
>> 32629 ± 22% +289.7% 127148 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.MIN_vruntime.stddev
>> 44053 +192.3% 128774 sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.avg
>> 140530 ± 9% +377.8% 671471 ± 29% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.max
>> 33108 ± 2% +109.9% 69484 ± 2% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.min
>> 20291 ± 7% +386.1% 98642 ± 21% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.stddev
>> 0.25 ± 82% -88.4% 0.03 ±131% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.min
>> 8096 ± 28% +278.9% 30679 ± 20% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.max_vruntime.avg
>> 158062 ± 17% +299.5% 631442 ± 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.max_vruntime.max
>> 32629 ± 22% +289.7% 127148 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.max_vruntime.stddev
>> 184170 +218.6% 586859 ± 2% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.avg
>> 251516 ± 4% +254.5% 891702 ± 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.max
>> 165614 +131.3% 383025 ± 2% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.min
>> 15286 ± 9% +1057.3% 176903 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.stddev
>> 0.67 ± 6% +45.5% 0.98 ± 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.avg
>> 0.74 ± 20% +32.4% 0.98 ± 13% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.stddev
>> 3.43 ± 29% -60.7% 1.35 ±100% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.load_avg.avg
>> 75.10 ± 34% -84.1% 11.91 ±100% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.load_avg.max
>> 15.24 ± 23% -75.5% 3.74 ±100% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.load_avg.stddev
>> 157.58 ± 29% -60.5% 62.19 ±100% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.runnable_sum.avg
>> 3459 ± 34% -84.0% 552.75 ± 99% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.runnable_sum.max
>> 700.79 ± 23% -75.4% 172.66 ±100% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.runnable_sum.stddev
>> 34.81 ± 42% -87.0% 4.53 ±100% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.util_avg.max
>> 5.89 ± 31% -79.0% 1.23 ±100% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.util_avg.stddev
>> 59642 ± 58% +506.4% 361657 ± 61% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.max
>> 15286 ± 9% +1057.2% 176904 ± 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.stddev
>> 15.81 ± 15% +28.7% 20.34 ± 2% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est_enqueued.avg
>> 553.04 ± 15% +42.8% 789.60 ± 2% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est_enqueued.max
>> 83.37 ± 15% +37.7% 114.78 ± 2% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est_enqueued.stddev
>> 130721 -17.9% 107295 sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.avg
>> 32650 ± 7% -16.9% 27145 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.min
>> 509212 +151.7% 1281639 sched_debug.cpu.clock.avg
>> 509215 +151.7% 1281642 sched_debug.cpu.clock.max
>> 509209 +151.7% 1281636 sched_debug.cpu.clock.min
>> 509212 +151.7% 1281639 sched_debug.cpu.clock_task.avg
>> 509215 +151.7% 1281642 sched_debug.cpu.clock_task.max
>> 509209 +151.7% 1281636 sched_debug.cpu.clock_task.min
>> 480.69 ± 2% +89.2% 909.42 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.avg
>> 14037 +135.4% 33040 sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.max
>> 2146 ± 2% +125.6% 4843 sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.stddev
>> 0.12 ± 5% +10.2% 0.13 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu.nr_running.avg
>> 10174129 +208.2% 31360192 sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
>> 10849045 +290.1% 42321541 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.max
>> 564008 ± 15% +1719.4% 10261545 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev
>> -87.16 +262.4% -315.83 sched_debug.cpu.nr_uninterruptible.min
>> 66.84 ± 14% +143.1% 162.48 ± 21% sched_debug.cpu.nr_uninterruptible.stddev
>> 10172460 +208.3% 31358619 sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.avg
>> 10847113 +290.1% 42319816 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.max
>> 563945 ± 15% +1719.6% 10261603 ± 8% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.stddev
>> 4957584 +211.1% 15425344 sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.avg
>> 5286410 +291.7% 20709361 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.max
>> 272603 ± 14% +1717.5% 4954528 ± 7% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.stddev
>> 5120024 +209.4% 15841794 sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.avg
>> 58965381 ± 14% +567.2% 3.934e+08 ± 33% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.max
>> 132694 ± 2% -41.0% 78274 ± 5% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.min
>> 11266172 ± 8% +482.6% 65635267 ± 21% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.stddev
>> 114955 +26.1% 144930 ± 3% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.max
>> 83595 ± 4% -53.0% 39284 ± 30% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.min
>> 5967 ± 16% +460.9% 33468 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.stddev
>> 509209 +151.7% 1281636 sched_debug.cpu_clk
>> 506629 +152.5% 1279056 sched_debug.ktime
>> 509627 +151.6% 1282053 sched_debug.sched_clk
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists