linux-kernel - [PATCH-next] locktorture: use true, false for bool variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1586779379-103799-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 20:02:59 +0800
From:   Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
To:     <dave@...olabs.net>, <paulmck@...nel.org>, <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH-next] locktorture: use true, false for bool variable

Fixes coccicheck warning:

kernel/locking/locktorture.c:689:6-10: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:907:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:938:3-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:668:2-19: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:674:2-19: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:634:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:640:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
---
 kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index 5efbfc6..8ff6f50 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -631,13 +631,13 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg)
 		cxt.cur_ops->writelock();
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_write_held))
 			lwsp->n_lock_fail++;
-		lock_is_write_held = 1;
+		lock_is_write_held = true;
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_read_held))
 			lwsp->n_lock_fail++; /* rare, but... */
 
 		lwsp->n_lock_acquired++;
 		cxt.cur_ops->write_delay(&rand);
-		lock_is_write_held = 0;
+		lock_is_write_held = false;
 		cxt.cur_ops->writeunlock();
 
 		stutter_wait("lock_torture_writer");
@@ -665,13 +665,13 @@ static int lock_torture_reader(void *arg)
 			schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
 
 		cxt.cur_ops->readlock();
-		lock_is_read_held = 1;
+		lock_is_read_held = true;
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_write_held))
 			lrsp->n_lock_fail++; /* rare, but... */
 
 		lrsp->n_lock_acquired++;
 		cxt.cur_ops->read_delay(&rand);
-		lock_is_read_held = 0;
+		lock_is_read_held = false;
 		cxt.cur_ops->readunlock();
 
 		stutter_wait("lock_torture_reader");
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static int lock_torture_reader(void *arg)
 static void __torture_print_stats(char *page,
 				  struct lock_stress_stats *statp, bool write)
 {
-	bool fail = 0;
+	bool fail = false;
 	int i, n_stress;
 	long max = 0, min = statp ? statp[0].n_lock_acquired : 0;
 	long long sum = 0;
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 
 	/* Initialize the statistics so that each run gets its own numbers. */
 	if (nwriters_stress) {
-		lock_is_write_held = 0;
+		lock_is_write_held = false;
 		cxt.lwsa = kmalloc_array(cxt.nrealwriters_stress,
 					 sizeof(*cxt.lwsa),
 					 GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 		}
 
 		if (nreaders_stress) {
-			lock_is_read_held = 0;
+			lock_is_read_held = false;
 			cxt.lrsa = kmalloc_array(cxt.nrealreaders_stress,
 						 sizeof(*cxt.lrsa),
 						 GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
2.6.2