lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200413125054.GB3077651@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:50:54 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Camylla Goncalves Cantanheide <c.cantanheide@...il.com>
Cc:     navid.emamdoost@...il.com, sylphrenadin@...il.com,
        nishkadg.linux@...il.com, stephen@...nnan.io,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lkcamp@...ts.libreplanetbr.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: rtl8192u: Renames variables in setKey
 function

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 03:01:29AM +0000, Camylla Goncalves Cantanheide wrote:
> Renames the local variables of the setKey
> function, making them explicit.

Why do this?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Camylla Goncalves Cantanheide <c.cantanheide@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c | 48 +++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
> index 87c02aee3854..cc02c3b1eb91 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
> @@ -4877,48 +4877,48 @@ void EnableHWSecurityConfig8192(struct net_device *dev)
>  	write_nic_byte(dev, SECR,  SECR_value);
>  }
>  
> -void setKey(struct net_device *dev, u8 entryno, u8 keyindex, u16 keytype,
> -	    u8 *macaddr, u8 defaultkey, u32 *keycontent)
> +void setKey(struct net_device *dev, u8 entry_no, u8 key_idx, u16 key_type,
> +	    u8 *mac_addr, u8 default_key, u32 *key_content)

What was wrong with the original names?  Why add a '_' character for no
good reason?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ