lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA+D8AOapHbw_AREcJmef2tnM4aNiU11FLacW3HS7CXQThs80Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 11:16:31 +0800
From:   Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc:     Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] ASoC: fsl_asrc: Move common definition to fsl_asrc_common

On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:08 AM Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 01:49:43PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
>
> > > > diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
> > > > index b15946e03380..5cf0468ce6e3 100644
> > > > --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
> > > > +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc_dma.c
> > >
> > > > @@ -311,11 +311,12 @@ static int fsl_asrc_dma_startup(struct snd_soc_component *component,
> > > >               return ret;
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > > -     pair = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fsl_asrc_pair), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +     pair = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fsl_asrc_pair) + PAIR_PRIVAT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > >
> > > If we only use the PAIR_PRIVATE_SIZE here, maybe we can put the
> > > define in this file too, rather than in the header file.
> > >
> > > And could fit 80 characters:
> > >
> > > +       pair = kzalloc(sizeof(*pair) + PAIR_PRIVAT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> > I will use a function pointer
> >     int (*get_pair_priv_size)(void)
>
> Since it's the size of pair or cts structure, could be just a
> size_t variable?

Yes, should be "size_t (*get_pair_priv_size)(void)"

best regards
wang shengjiu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ