[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200413032930.GB18479@araj-mobl1.jf.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 20:29:31 -0700
From: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
To: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@...el.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sun, Yi Y" <yi.y.sun@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] vfio/pci: Emulate PASID/PRI capability for VFs
Hi Alex
Going through the PCIe Spec, there seems a lot of such capabilities
that are different between PF and VF. Some that make sense
and some don't.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 08:10:43PM -0700, Raj, Ashok wrote:
>
> >
> > I agree though, I don't know why the SIG would preclude implementing
> > per VF control of these features. Thanks,
> >
For e.g.
VF doesn't have I/O and Mem space enables, but has BME
Interrupt Status
Correctable Error Reporting
Almost all of Device Control Register.
So it seems like there is a ton of them we have to deal with today for
VF's. How do we manage to emulate them without any support for them
in VF's?
>
> Cheers,
> Ashok
Powered by blists - more mailing lists