[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6c8042f-bca7-22a9-287f-cee05ae347a8@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:05:28 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64/cpufeature: Add DIT and CSV2 feature bits in
ID_PFR0 register
On 04/09/2020 06:25 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:09:05PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Enable DIT and CSV2 feature bits in ID_PFR0 register as per ARM DDI 0487E.a
>> specification. Except RAS and AMU, all other feature bits are now enabled.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 3 +++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> index 054aab7ebf1b..469d61c8fabf 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
>> @@ -718,6 +718,9 @@
>> #define ID_ISAR6_DP_SHIFT 4
>> #define ID_ISAR6_JSCVT_SHIFT 0
>>
>> +#define ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT 24
>> +#define ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT 16
>> +
>> #define ID_PFR2_SSBS_SHIFT 4
>> #define ID_PFR2_CSV3_SHIFT 0
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index c1e837fc8f97..9e4dab15c608 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_isar6[] = {
>> };
>>
>> static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_pfr0[] = {
>> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_DIT_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>
> Same comment as CSV3 here. Why is CSV2 being treated as strict here, but not
> in the aa64* register?
Sure, will change.
>
> Will
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists