lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:30:38 -0700
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     David Binderman <dcb314@...mail.com>,
        "fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-5.7-rc1/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cqm_test.c:89:15:
 error: Buffer is accessed out of bounds

+Sai

On 4/13/2020 2:43 AM, David Binderman wrote:
> Hello there,
> 
> Source code is
> 
>    while (fgets(temp, 1024, fp)) {
> 
> but
> 
>     char *token_array[8], temp[512];
> 
> Use of compiler flag -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 would have found the problem.
> For example:
> 
> # include <stdio.h>
> 
> extern void g( int);
> 
> void
> f( FILE * fp)
> {
> 	char buf[ 100];
> 
> 	while (fgets( buf, 200, fp) != 0)
> 	{
> 		g( 1);
> 	}
> }
> 
> gives
> 
> $ /home/dcb/gcc/results/bin/gcc -c -g -O2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 apr13c.cc
> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:867,
>                  from apr13c.cc:2:
> In function ‘char* fgets(char*, int, FILE*)’,
>     inlined from ‘void f(FILE*)’ at apr13c.cc:11:14:
> /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:263:26: warning: call to ‘__fgets_chk_warn’ declared with attribute warning: fgets called with bigger size than length of destination buffer [-Wattribute-warning]
> 
> I suggest switch on compiler flag -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 in
> all development builds.
> 

Thank you very much for catching this David.

Sai: could you include this fix in your upcoming series of fixes? Using
the pattern of "fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), ...)" instead of hard coding the
size should be helpful here.

Reinette



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ