[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1o8rvxoit.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:51:22 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
paolo.valente@...aro.org, groeck@...omium.org,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, sqazi@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] Revert "scsi: core: run queue if SCSI device queue isn't ready and queue is idle"
Douglas,
> This reverts commit 7e70aa789d4a0c89dbfbd2c8a974a4df717475ec.
>
> Now that we have the patches ("blk-mq: In blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list()
> "no budget" is a reason to kick") and ("blk-mq: Rerun dispatching in
> the case of budget contention") we should no longer need the fix in
> the SCSI code. Revert it, resolving conflicts with other patches that
> have touched this code.
>
> With this revert (and the two new patches) I can run the script that
> was in commit 7e70aa789d4a ("scsi: core: run queue if SCSI device
> queue isn't ready and queue is idle") in a loop with no failure. If I
> do this revert without the two new patches I can easily get a failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Looks good to me, never really liked the original commit.
Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists