linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 27/35] netfilter: nf_tables: Allow set back-ends to report partial overlaps on insertion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200413223858.17b0f487@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 22:38:58 +0200
From:   Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 27/35] netfilter: nf_tables: Allow set
 back-ends to report partial overlaps on insertion

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:39:00 -0400
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 02:18:48AM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
>
> >I'm used to not Cc: stable on networking patches (Dave's net.git),
> >but I guess I should instead if they go through nf.git (Pablo's tree),
> >right?  
> 
> Yup, this confusion has caused for quite a few netfilter fixes to not
> land in -stable. If it goes through Pablo's tree (and unless he intructs
> otherwise), you should Cc stable.

Hah, thanks for clarifying.

What do you think I should do specifically with 72239f2795fa
("netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Drop spurious condition for overlap detection
on insertion")?

I haven't Cc'ed stable on that one. Can I expect AUTOSEL to pick it up
anyway?

-- 
Stefano