[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <d1e508e76d09e6de90a961aeefbc04021ab0f0ea.1586801373.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 13:58:03 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, fenghua.yu@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
tony.luck@...el.com
Cc: kuo-lang.tseng@...el.com, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
mingo@...hat.com, babu.moger@....com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/resctrl: Use appropriate API for strings terminated by newline
The user input to files in the resctrl filesystem are expected to be
terminated with a newline. Testing the user input includes a test for
the presence of a newline and then replacing the newline with NUL
byte followed by comparison using strcmp().
sysfs_streq() exists to test if strings are equal, treating both NUL and
newline-then-NUL as equivalent string terminations. Even more,
sysfs_match_string() exists to match a given string in an array using
sysfs_streq().
Replace existing strcmp() comparisons of strings that are terminated
with a newline with more appropriate sysfs_streq() via the
sysfs_match_string() API that can perform the match across the different
mode strings that are already maintained in an array.
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
---
Changes since V1:
- Remove unnecessary checks on user input (Andy Shevchenko)
- Change code style surrounding usage of sysfs_match_string() (Andy Shevchenko)
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index d4e9b8a204d6..a8cbec226633 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -1408,12 +1408,11 @@ static ssize_t rdtgroup_mode_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
{
struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
enum rdtgrp_mode mode;
- int ret = 0;
+ int user_m;
+ int ret;
- /* Valid input requires a trailing newline */
- if (nbytes == 0 || buf[nbytes - 1] != '\n')
+ if (nbytes == 0)
return -EINVAL;
- buf[nbytes - 1] = '\0';
rdtgrp = rdtgroup_kn_lock_live(of->kn);
if (!rdtgrp) {
@@ -1425,11 +1424,17 @@ static ssize_t rdtgroup_mode_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
mode = rdtgrp->mode;
- if ((!strcmp(buf, "shareable") && mode == RDT_MODE_SHAREABLE) ||
- (!strcmp(buf, "exclusive") && mode == RDT_MODE_EXCLUSIVE) ||
- (!strcmp(buf, "pseudo-locksetup") &&
- mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP) ||
- (!strcmp(buf, "pseudo-locked") && mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKED))
+ ret = sysfs_match_string(rdt_mode_str, buf);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ rdt_last_cmd_puts("Unknown or unsupported mode\n");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ user_m = ret;
+ ret = 0;
+
+ /* Do nothing and return success if user asks for current mode */
+ if (user_m == mode)
goto out;
if (mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKED) {
@@ -1438,14 +1443,14 @@ static ssize_t rdtgroup_mode_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
goto out;
}
- if (!strcmp(buf, "shareable")) {
+ if (user_m == RDT_MODE_SHAREABLE) {
if (rdtgrp->mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP) {
ret = rdtgroup_locksetup_exit(rdtgrp);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
rdtgrp->mode = RDT_MODE_SHAREABLE;
- } else if (!strcmp(buf, "exclusive")) {
+ } else if (user_m == RDT_MODE_EXCLUSIVE) {
if (!rdtgroup_mode_test_exclusive(rdtgrp)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
@@ -1456,14 +1461,11 @@ static ssize_t rdtgroup_mode_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
goto out;
}
rdtgrp->mode = RDT_MODE_EXCLUSIVE;
- } else if (!strcmp(buf, "pseudo-locksetup")) {
+ } else if (user_m == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP) {
ret = rdtgroup_locksetup_enter(rdtgrp);
if (ret)
goto out;
rdtgrp->mode = RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP;
- } else {
- rdt_last_cmd_puts("Unknown or unsupported mode\n");
- ret = -EINVAL;
}
out:
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists