linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: read_tcs_reg()/write_tcs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 16:03:18 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     mka@...omium.org, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        evgreen@...omium.org, Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: read_tcs_reg()/write_tcs_reg() are not for IRQ

Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-04-13 10:04:15)
> The RSC_DRV_IRQ_ENABLE, RSC_DRV_IRQ_STATUS, and RSC_DRV_IRQ_CLEAR
> registers are not part of TCS 0.  Let's not pretend that they are by
> using read_tcs_reg() and write_tcs_reg() and passing a bogus tcs_id of
> 0.  We could introduce a new wrapper for these registers but it
> wouldn't buy us much.  Let's just read/write directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
> Tested-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>