linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/5] staging: vt6656: Rebase all rejected patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200414153849.5785-1-oscar.carter@gmx.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:38:44 +0200
From:   Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>
To:     Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>,
        Quentin Deslandes <quentin.deslandes@...ev.co.uk>,
        Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@...il.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Amir Mahdi Ghorbanian <indigoomega021@...il.com>,
        "John B. Wyatt IV" <jbwyatt4@...il.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] staging: vt6656: Rebase all rejected patches

This patch series makes a "rebase" of all the patches that were
previously rejected because they did not apply.

The first patch uses the error code returned by the vnt_control_out
function as the returned value of the vnt_rf_write_embedded function
instead of a boolean value. This way, the return value is an error code.
Also, fix all the vnt_rf_write_embedded calls accordingly.

The second patch uses the BIT() macro instead of the bit left shift
operator.

The third patch use the define RATE_11M present in the file "device.h"
instead of the magic number 3.

The fourth patch creates a constant array with the values of the
"phy->signal" variable for every rate and makes a refactor of the
assignment of this variable.

The fifth path takes out the "phy->service" assignment from the if-else
statement due to it's the same for the two branches.

Oscar Carter (5):
  staging: vt6656: Return error code in vnt_rf_write_embedded function
  staging: vt6656: Use BIT() macro instead of bit shift operator
  staging: vt6656: Use define instead of magic number for tx_rate
  staging: vt6656: Refactor the assignment of the phy->signal variable
  staging: vt6656: Remove duplicate code for the phy->service assignment

 drivers/staging/vt6656/baseband.c | 111 ++++++++----------------------
 drivers/staging/vt6656/card.c     |   4 +-
 drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c       |  99 ++++++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)

--
2.20.1