[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200414174644.GD24061@xps15>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:46:44 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: nikita.shubin@...uefel.me
Cc: Nikita Shubin <NShubin@...con.com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] remoteproc: imx_rproc: memory regions
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 02:33:10PM +0300, nikita.shubin@...uefel.me wrote:
> Add support for carveout memory regions required for vdev vring's and
> buffer.
>
> Search in device tree and allocate memory regions like for ocram:
>
> vdev0vring0: vdev0vring0@...20000 {
> compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> reg = <0x00920000 0x2000>;
> no-map;
> };
>
> vdev0vring1: vdev0vring1@...22000 {
> compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> reg = <0x00922000 0x2000>;
> no-map;
> };
>
> vdev0buffer: vdev0buffer@...24000 {
> compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> reg = <0x00924000 0x4000>;
> no-map;
> };
>
> imx7d-cm4 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx7d-cm4";
> memory-region = <&ocram>, <&vdev0vring0>, <&vdev0vring1>, \
> <&vdev0buffer>;
> }
>
> vdev0vring0, vdev0vring1, vdev0buffer are required for virtio
> functioning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <NShubin@...con.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index d2bede4ccb70..cdcff2bd2867 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> @@ -238,6 +239,29 @@ static int imx_rproc_da_to_sys(struct imx_rproc *priv, u64 da,
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> +static int imx_rproc_sys_to_da(struct imx_rproc *priv, u64 sys,
> + int len, u64 *da)
> +{
> + const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg;
> + int i;
> +
> + /* parse address translation table */
> + for (i = 0; i < dcfg->att_size; i++) {
> + const struct imx_rproc_att *att = &dcfg->att[i];
> +
> + if (sys >= att->sa && sys + len <= att->sa + att->size) {
> + unsigned int offset = sys - att->sa;
> +
> + *da = att->da + offset;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + dev_warn(priv->dev, "Translation failed: sys = 0x%llx len = 0x%x\n",
> + sys, len);
> + return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
> static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
> {
> struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> @@ -372,16 +396,109 @@ static void imx_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> err = mbox_send_message(ddata->mb[i].chan, &vqid);
> if (err < 0)
> dev_err(&rproc->dev, "%s: failed (%s, err:%d)\n",
> - __func__, ddata->mb[i].name, err);
> + __func__, ddata->mb[i].name, err);
> return;
> }
> }
>
> +static int imx_rproc_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> + void *va;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "map memory: %pa+%x\n", &mem->dma, mem->len);
> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%x\n",
> + &mem->dma, mem->len);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update memory entry va */
> + mem->va = va;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc,
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> + dev_dbg(rproc->dev.parent, "unmap memory: %pa\n", &mem->dma);
> + iounmap(mem->va);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct of_phandle_iterator it;
> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem = 0;
> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> + u64 da;
> + int index = 0;
> +
> + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
> + of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, np, "memory-region", NULL, 0);
This will likely clash with the parsing done in imx_rproc_addr_init(), and the
parsing in there will also clash with what is done below... I advise you to
register carvouts in imx_rproc_addr_init() as you parse the rest of the memory
regions.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> + while (of_phandle_iterator_next(&it) == 0) {
> + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
> + if (!rmem) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Let's assume all data in device tree is from
> + * CPU A7 point of view then we should translate
> + * rmem->base into M4 da
> + */
> + if (imx_rproc_sys_to_da(priv, rmem->base, rmem->size, &da)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "memory region not valid %pa\n",
> + &rmem->base);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (strcmp(it.node->name, "vdev0buffer")) {
> + /* Register memory region */
> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL,
> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> + rmem->size, da,
> + imx_rproc_mem_alloc,
> + imx_rproc_mem_release,
> + it.node->name);
> +
> + if (mem)
> + rproc_coredump_add_segment(rproc, da,
> + rmem->size);
> + } else {
> + mem = rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(dev, index,
> + rmem->size,
> + rmem->base,
> + it.node->name);
> + }
> +
> + if (!mem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
> + index++;
> + }
> +
> + return rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> +}
> +
> static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
> .start = imx_rproc_start,
> .stop = imx_rproc_stop,
> .da_to_va = imx_rproc_da_to_va,
> .kick = imx_rproc_kick,
> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> + .parse_fw = imx_rproc_parse_fw,
> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> };
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists