[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+HBbNE_-Pjr6dZ3qjgk1MiaT3PL9eUgs=XfK-ohkWDCR9yfZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 20:03:59 +0200
From: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>,
Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: phy: mdio: add IPQ40xx MDIO driver
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:42 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
> > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_CAVIUM) += mdio-cavium.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_GPIO) += mdio-gpio.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_HISI_FEMAC) += mdio-hisi-femac.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_I2C) += mdio-i2c.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_IPQ40XX) += mdio-ipq40xx.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_MOXART) += mdio-moxart.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_MSCC_MIIM) += mdio-mscc-miim.o
>
> Hi Robert
>
> That looks odd. What happened to the
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_IPQ8064) += mdio-ipq8064.o
>
Sorry, this was based off kernel 5.6 instead of net-next.
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MDIO_OCTEON) += mdio-octeon.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq40xx.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq40xx.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..8068f1e6a077
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-ipq40xx.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause
> > +/* Copyright (c) 2015, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_mdio.h>
> > +#include <linux/phy.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +
> > +#define MDIO_CTRL_0_REG 0x40
> > +#define MDIO_CTRL_1_REG 0x44
> > +#define MDIO_CTRL_2_REG 0x48
> > +#define MDIO_CTRL_3_REG 0x4c
> > +#define MDIO_CTRL_4_REG 0x50
>
> Can we have better names than as. It seems like 3 is read data, 2 is
> write data, etc.
I agree these ones don't really tell whats the function.
Unfortunately, I don't have access to documentation and this is all based on
GPL code from Qualcomm's SDK.
So I don't really know whats their purpose.
It has been floating around for years, so I thought that it would be good to
clean it up and upstream.
>
> > +#define MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_BUSY BIT(16)
> > +#define MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_START BIT(8)
> > +#define MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_CODE_READ 0
> > +#define MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_CODE_WRITE 1
> > +#define CTRL_0_REG_DEFAULT_VALUE 0x150FF
>
> No magic numbers please. Try to explain what each of these bits
> do. I'm guessing they are clock speed, preamble enable, maybe C22/C45?
Fortunately, it seems that this is a leftover from early preproduction HW as
my test boards work without it.
Something similar was the case in other Qualcomm SDK drivers.
So, this will be dropped in v2.
>
> > +
> > +#define IPQ40XX_MDIO_RETRY 1000
> > +#define IPQ40XX_MDIO_DELAY 10
> > +
> > +struct ipq40xx_mdio_data {
> > + struct mii_bus *mii_bus;
> > + void __iomem *membase;
> > + struct device *dev;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int ipq40xx_mdio_wait_busy(struct ipq40xx_mdio_data *am)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < IPQ40XX_MDIO_RETRY; i++) {
> > + unsigned int busy;
> > +
> > + busy = readl(am->membase + MDIO_CTRL_4_REG) &
> > + MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_BUSY;
> > + if (!busy)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* BUSY might take to be cleard by 15~20 times of loop */
> > + udelay(IPQ40XX_MDIO_DELAY);
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev_err(am->dev, "%s: MDIO operation timed out\n", am->mii_bus->name);
>
> dev_err() should give you enough to identify the device. No need to
> print am->mii_bus->name as well.
It will be fixed in v2, thanks.
>
> > +
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ipq40xx_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int mii_id, int regnum)
> > +{
> > + struct ipq40xx_mdio_data *am = bus->priv;
> > + int value = 0;
> > + unsigned int cmd = 0;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&bus->mdio_lock);
>
> Do you think the core is broken?
No, this is also an old relic from the SDK driver.
It works without this perfectly fine, so I will drop it from v2.
>
> Please check if the request is for a C45 read, and return -EOPNOTSUPP
> if so.
It will be added to v2, thanks.
>
>
> > +
> > + if (ipq40xx_mdio_wait_busy(am))
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +
> > + /* issue the phy address and reg */
> > + writel((mii_id << 8) | regnum, am->membase + MDIO_CTRL_1_REG);
> > +
> > + cmd = MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_START | MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_CODE_READ;
> > +
> > + /* issue read command */
> > + writel(cmd, am->membase + MDIO_CTRL_4_REG);
> > +
> > + /* Wait read complete */
> > + if (ipq40xx_mdio_wait_busy(am))
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +
> > + /* Read data */
> > + value = readl(am->membase + MDIO_CTRL_3_REG);
> > +
> > + return value;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ipq40xx_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int mii_id, int regnum,
> > + u16 value)
> > +{
> > + struct ipq40xx_mdio_data *am = bus->priv;
> > + unsigned int cmd = 0;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&bus->mdio_lock);
> > +
> > + if (ipq40xx_mdio_wait_busy(am))
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +
> > + /* issue the phy address and reg */
> > + writel((mii_id << 8) | regnum, am->membase + MDIO_CTRL_1_REG);
> > +
> > + /* issue write data */
> > + writel(value, am->membase + MDIO_CTRL_2_REG);
> > +
> > + cmd = MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_START | MDIO_CTRL_4_ACCESS_CODE_WRITE;
> > + /* issue write command */
> > + writel(cmd, am->membase + MDIO_CTRL_4_REG);
> > +
> > + /* Wait write complete */
> > + if (ipq40xx_mdio_wait_busy(am))
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ipq40xx_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct ipq40xx_mdio_data *am;
>
> Why the name am? Generally priv is used. I could also understand bus,
> or even data, but am?
Like most stuff in this driver, its a leftover from the SDK driver.
I have changed it to priv in v2, also I switched the driver to
devm_mdiobus_alloc_size() to
try and simplify/modernize the driver also.
Thanks for the suggestions.
I will send a v2 soon.
Best regards,
Andrew
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists