linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "Kernel selftests: tpm2: check for tpm support"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200414193800.GE13000@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 22:38:00 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        Nikita Sobolev <Nikita.Sobolev@...opsys.com>,
        Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "Kernel selftests: tpm2: check for tpm support"

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:37:25PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 09:12:05AM -0600, shuah wrote:
> > On 4/12/20 8:23 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > This reverts commit b32694cd0724d4ceca2c62cc7c3d3a8d1ffa11fc.
> > > 
> > > The original comment
> > 
> > commit I assume.
> > 
> >  was neither reviewed nor tested. Thus, this the
> > > *only* possible action to take.
> > > 
> > 
> > Bummer. I will apply this right away.
> 
> No worries, and fine with the change as long as I'm able to
> review and try it out :-) Sorry for the dull tone!

I mean refined change after this revert has been applied.

/Jarkko