[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200414162742.0ef4d9ee@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:27:42 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>,
Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched/rt: Distribute tasks in find_lowest_rq()
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:58:49 +0100
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com> wrote:
> To move this forward, I would suggest renaming the current cpumask_any_*()
> into cpumask_first_*(), and THEN introduce the new pseudo-random
> ones. People are then free to hand-fix specific locations if it makes sense
> there, like you're doing for RT.
Or leave "cpumask_any()" as is, and create a new "cpumask_random()" for
this purpose.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists