[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7120e71c7d0811eebab59186e262bd294763a67.camel@analog.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 06:07:19 +0000
From: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
To: "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] iio: core: register buffer fileops only if buffer
present
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 05:20 +0000, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
> [External]
>
> On Mon, 2020-04-13 at 16:47 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > [External]
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:17:25 +0300
> > Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The intent is to localize all buffer ops into the industrialio-buffer.c
> > > file, to be able to add support for multiple buffers per IIO device.
> > >
> > > We still need to allocate a chardev in __iio_device_register() to be able
> > > to pass event ioctl commands. So, if the IIO device has no buffer, we
> > > create the legacy chardev for the event ioctl() command.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
> >
> > Whilst we are here, can we avoid allocating the chardev at all if
> > we have neither buffer support, nor events? So don't add the chrdev to the
> > device.
>
> That should happen after patch 5/5.
> If there aren't any buffers, and 'indio_dev->event_interface' is NULL, no
> chardev should exist.
>
> Maybe I can reduce this, given the fact that this goes away into files later.
> I did things in very-small incremental steps that I later squashed.
>
> This patch kind of highlights an intermediate step towards the final rework
> [moving chardevs into files]
oh...
silly me
we can check if 'indio_dev->event_interface' is NULL here as well
>
> > That covers quite a wide range of slow devices and is a nice incidental
> > improvement (to be honest I'd forgotten we actually created a chardev
> > in those circumstance :(
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-
> > > core.c
> > > index 157d95a24faa..c8c074602709 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> > > @@ -1707,6 +1707,15 @@ static int iio_check_unique_scan_index(struct
> > > iio_dev
> > > *indio_dev)
> > >
> > > static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops noop_ring_setup_ops;
> > >
> > > +static const struct file_operations iio_event_fileops = {
> > > + .release = iio_chrdev_release,
> > > + .open = iio_chrdev_open,
> > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > > + .llseek = noop_llseek,
> > > + .unlocked_ioctl = iio_ioctl,
> > > + .compat_ioctl = compat_ptr_ioctl,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > int __iio_device_register(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, struct module
> > > *this_mod)
> > > {
> > > int ret;
> > > @@ -1757,7 +1766,10 @@ int __iio_device_register(struct iio_dev
> > > *indio_dev,
> > > struct module *this_mod)
> > > indio_dev->setup_ops == NULL)
> > > indio_dev->setup_ops = &noop_ring_setup_ops;
> > >
> > > - cdev_init(&indio_dev->chrdev, &iio_buffer_fileops);
> > > + if (indio_dev->buffer)
> > > + cdev_init(&indio_dev->chrdev, &iio_buffer_fileops);
> > > + else
> > > + cdev_init(&indio_dev->chrdev, &iio_event_fileops);
> > >
> > > indio_dev->chrdev.owner = this_mod;
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists