linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: reset: meson: add gxl internal dac reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:28:08 +0200
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc:     linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: reset: meson: add gxl internal dac reset


On Thu 23 Jan 2020 at 11:13, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote:

> On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 10:25 +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> Add the reset line of the internal DAC found on the amlogic gxl SoC family
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
>> ---
>>  include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-gxbb-reset.h | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-gxbb-reset.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-gxbb-reset.h
>> index ea5058618863..883bfd3bcbad 100644
>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-gxbb-reset.h
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-gxbb-reset.h
>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
>>  #define RESET_SYS_CPU_L2		58
>>  #define RESET_SYS_CPU_P			59
>>  #define RESET_SYS_CPU_MBIST		60
>> -/*					61	*/
>> +#define RESET_ACODEC			61
>>  /*					62	*/
>>  /*					63	*/
>>  /*	RESET2					*/
>
> Thank you, applied to reset/next.

Hi Philip,

It seems reset/next has not made it to v5.7-rc1

Would it be possible to provide an immutable branch with this change, or
maybe let Kevin apply this change through the amlogic tree ?

It would allow us to progress on some DT changes during this new cycle.

Thanks
Jerome

>
> regards
> Philipp