linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] power: supply: Add support for mps mp2629 battery charger

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdRXWVtveRnvR-k8wqH5R_P7owfQvFf7YT3qM_oVEY3vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:05:15 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc:     saravanan sekar <sravanhome@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] power: supply: Add support for mps mp2629 battery charger

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:48 PM Sebastian Reichel
<sebastian.reichel@...labora.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:28:19PM +0200, saravanan sekar wrote:
> > On 13/04/20 10:10 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:37 PM Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@...il.com> wrote:

...

> > > > +       irq = platform_get_irq(to_platform_device(pdev->dev.parent), 0);
> > > Why not to use temporary variable dev?
> > >
> > > This should be platform_get_irq_optional().
> >
> > Platform_get_irq in turn calls platform_get_irq_optional. It was suggested
> > by Lee and is it mandatory to change it?
>
> platform_get_irq is fine.

I don't think so. It will spill an error in case there is no IRQ or
error happened.

So, either is should be _optional, or below conditional simply wrong, should be
  if (irq < 0)
    return irq;

> > > > +       if (irq) {
>
> But this must be
>
> if (irq > 0)
>
> or you will also try to continue with error codes.
>
> > > > +               ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, mp2629_irq_handler,
> > > > +                                IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "mp2629-charger",
> > > > +                                charger);
> > > > +               if (ret) {
> > > > +                       dev_err(dev, "failed to request gpio IRQ\n");
> > > > +                       goto iio_fail;
> > > > +               }
> > > > +       }
> > > > +}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko