[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5E951914.70104@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:59:48 +0800
From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@...fujitsu.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix the race between registering 'snapshot'
event trigger and triggering 'snapshot' operation
On 2020/4/13 23:02, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:12:52 +0800
> Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> Traced event can trigger 'snapshot' operation(i.e. calls snapshot_trigger()
>> or snapshot_count_trigger()) when register_snapshot_trigger() has completed
>> registration but doesn't allocate spare buffer for 'snapshot' event trigger.
>> 'snapshot' operation always detects the lack of allocated buffer in the rare
>> case so make register_snapshot_trigger() allocate spare buffer first.
>>
>> trigger-snapshot.tc in kselftest reproduces the issue on slow vm:
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> cat trace
>> ...
>> ftracetest-3028 [002] .... 236.784290: sched_process_fork: comm=ftracetest pid=3028 child_comm=ftracetest child_pid=3036
>> <...>-2875 [003] .... 240.460335: tracing_snapshot_instance_cond: *** SNAPSHOT NOT ALLOCATED ***
>> <...>-2875 [003] .... 240.460338: tracing_snapshot_instance_cond: *** stopping trace here! ***
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
>> index dd34a1b46a86..00e54cdcef3e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
>> @@ -1088,9 +1088,13 @@ register_snapshot_trigger(char *glob, struct event_trigger_ops *ops,
>> struct event_trigger_data *data,
>> struct trace_event_file *file)
>> {
>> - int ret = register_trigger(glob, ops, data, file);
>> + int alloc_ret, ret;
>>
>> - if (ret> 0&& tracing_alloc_snapshot_instance(file->tr) != 0) {
>> + alloc_ret = tracing_alloc_snapshot_instance(file->tr);
>> +
>> + ret = register_trigger(glob, ops, data, file);
>> +
>> + if (ret> 0&& alloc_ret != 0) {
>> unregister_trigger(glob, ops, data, file);
>> ret = 0;
>> }
>
>
> Why register if the allocation failed? Just switch the logic:
>
> int ret = tracing_alloc_snapshot_instance(file->tr);
>
> if (ret != 0)
> return 0;
>
> return register_trigger(glob, ops, data, file);
Hi Steve,
It looks simpler and better.
I think we can drop the unnecessary ret variable as well.
Thanks,
Xiao Yang
>
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists