[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200414105723.GN20713@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:57:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Peng Wang <rocking@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, uri.lelli@...hat.com,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Simplify the code of should_we_balance()
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 09:25:00AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 11:21, Peng Wang <rocking@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > We only consider group_balance_cpu() after there is no idle
> > cpu. So, just do comparison before return at these two cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Wang <rocking@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> With the small fix in the comment below
Done
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Thanks Guys!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists