[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200414114226.96691-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:42:26 +0800
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: peterhuewe@....de, jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
zhang.jia@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH] tpm: fix wrong return value in tpm_pcr_extend
For the algorithm that does not match the bank, a positive
value EINVAL is returned here. I think this is a typo error.
It is necessary to return an error value.
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
index a438b1206fcb..1621ce818705 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ int tpm_pcr_extend(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 pcr_idx,
for (i = 0; i < chip->nr_allocated_banks; i++) {
if (digests[i].alg_id != chip->allocated_banks[i].alg_id) {
- rc = EINVAL;
+ rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists