lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:56:05 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Ivan Safonov <isaf21@...dex.ru>
Cc:     Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>,
        Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] staging: rtl8188eu: Remove function rtw_modular64()

On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 04:34:08PM +0300, Ivan Safonov wrote:
> > Remove function rtw_modular64 as all it does is call do_div.
> 
> This is wrong. Macro do_div(x, y) change first argument x, but
> rtw_modular64(x, y) preserve it.
> 
> > +			tsf = pmlmeext->TSFValue - do_div(pmlmeext->TSFValue, (pmlmeinfo->bcn_interval*1024)) - 1024; /* us */
> 
> rounddown(pmlmeext->TSFValue, pmlmeinfo->bcn_interval * 1024) - 1024
> is a better replacement for

You're absolutely correct that the patch is buggy, but I'm not sure that
rounddown() is what we want.

rtw_modular64() took the MOD of x.  So it should be something like:

	tsf = pmlmeext->TSFValue - (pmlmeext->TSFValue % (pmlmeinfo->bcn_interval * 1024)) - 1024; /* us */

But what the heck is that even???  If pmlmeinfo->bcn_interval is zero
or one then the subtraction ends up giving us a negative.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ