[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZgWUwmmuXn12DS3TsQS0yQxcweqK6HGxBm=V_2LBLBMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:00:34 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: don't call sleeping functions with a spinlock taken
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:31 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> We must not call pinctrl_gpio_can_use_line() with the gpio_lock taken
> as it takes a mutex internally. Let's move the call before taking the
> spinlock and store the return value.
>
> This isn't perfect - there's a moment between calling
> pinctrl_gpio_can_use_line() and taking the spinlock where the situation
> can change but it isn't a regression either: previously this part wasn't
> protected at all and it only affects the information user-space is
> seeing.
>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Fixes: d2ac25798208 ("gpiolib: provide a dedicated function for setting lineinfo")
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
I'm sorry that I lost track of this patch :(
Do we still need something like this or has it been fixed
by some other patches?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists