linux-kernel - [PATCH] firmware: qcom_scm: fix bogous abuse of dma-direct internals

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200414123136.441454-1-hch@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:31:36 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: qcom_scm: fix bogous abuse of dma-direct internals

As far as the device is concerned the dma address is the physical
address.  There is no need to convert it to a physical address,
especially not using dma-direct internals that are not available
to drivers and which will interact badly with IOMMUs.  Last but not
least the commit introducing it claimed to just fix a type issue,
but actually changed behavior.

Fixes: 6e37ccf78a532 ("firmware: qcom_scm: Use proper types for dma mappings")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
index 059bb0fbae9e..4701487573f7 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
-#include <linux/dma-direct.h>
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
@@ -806,8 +805,7 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
 	struct qcom_scm_mem_map_info *mem_to_map;
 	phys_addr_t mem_to_map_phys;
 	phys_addr_t dest_phys;
-	phys_addr_t ptr_phys;
-	dma_addr_t ptr_dma;
+	dma_addr_t ptr_phys;
 	size_t mem_to_map_sz;
 	size_t dest_sz;
 	size_t src_sz;
@@ -824,10 +822,9 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
 	ptr_sz = ALIGN(src_sz, SZ_64) + ALIGN(mem_to_map_sz, SZ_64) +
 			ALIGN(dest_sz, SZ_64);
 
-	ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, &ptr_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
+	ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, &ptr_phys, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ptr)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	ptr_phys = dma_to_phys(__scm->dev, ptr_dma);
 
 	/* Fill source vmid detail */
 	src = ptr;
@@ -855,7 +852,7 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
 
 	ret = __qcom_scm_assign_mem(__scm->dev, mem_to_map_phys, mem_to_map_sz,
 				    ptr_phys, src_sz, dest_phys, dest_sz);
-	dma_free_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, ptr, ptr_dma);
+	dma_free_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, ptr, ptr_phys);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(__scm->dev,
 			"Assign memory protection call failed %d\n", ret);
-- 
2.25.1