[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200414131348.444715-26-hch@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:13:44 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 25/29] mm: switch the test_vmalloc module to use __vmalloc_node
No need to export the very low-level __vmalloc_node_range when the
test module can use a slightly higher level variant.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
lib/test_vmalloc.c | 26 +++++++-------------------
mm/vmalloc.c | 17 ++++++++---------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_vmalloc.c b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
index 8bbefcaddfe8..cd6aef05dfb4 100644
--- a/lib/test_vmalloc.c
+++ b/lib/test_vmalloc.c
@@ -91,12 +91,8 @@ static int random_size_align_alloc_test(void)
*/
size = ((rnd % 10) + 1) * PAGE_SIZE;
- ptr = __vmalloc_node_range(size, align,
- VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
- GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
- PAGE_KERNEL,
- 0, 0, __builtin_return_address(0));
-
+ ptr = __vmalloc_node(size, align, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
+ __builtin_return_address(0));
if (!ptr)
return -1;
@@ -118,12 +114,8 @@ static int align_shift_alloc_test(void)
for (i = 0; i < BITS_PER_LONG; i++) {
align = ((unsigned long) 1) << i;
- ptr = __vmalloc_node_range(PAGE_SIZE, align,
- VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
- GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
- PAGE_KERNEL,
- 0, 0, __builtin_return_address(0));
-
+ ptr = __vmalloc_node(PAGE_SIZE, align, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
+ __builtin_return_address(0));
if (!ptr)
return -1;
@@ -139,13 +131,9 @@ static int fix_align_alloc_test(void)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < test_loop_count; i++) {
- ptr = __vmalloc_node_range(5 * PAGE_SIZE,
- THREAD_ALIGN << 1,
- VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
- GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
- PAGE_KERNEL,
- 0, 0, __builtin_return_address(0));
-
+ ptr = __vmalloc_node(5 * PAGE_SIZE, THREAD_ALIGN << 1,
+ GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO,
+ __builtin_return_address(0));
if (!ptr)
return -1;
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index ae8249ef5821..333fbe77255a 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2522,15 +2522,6 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
return NULL;
}
-/*
- * This is only for performance analysis of vmalloc and stress purpose.
- * It is required by vmalloc test module, therefore do not use it other
- * than that.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC_MODULE
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__vmalloc_node_range);
-#endif
-
/**
* __vmalloc_node - allocate virtually contiguous memory
* @size: allocation size
@@ -2556,6 +2547,14 @@ void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
return __vmalloc_node_range(size, align, VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
gfp_mask, PAGE_KERNEL, 0, node, caller);
}
+/*
+ * This is only for performance analysis of vmalloc and stress purpose.
+ * It is required by vmalloc test module, therefore do not use it other
+ * than that.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC_MODULE
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__vmalloc_node);
+#endif
void *__vmalloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists