| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200414142018.6e7e5ec3@why>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:20:18 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/meson-gpio: Fix HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe
lock order
On Tue, 7 Apr 2020 15:46:58 +0100
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
+Jerome, Martin,
> Running a lockedp-enabled kernel on a vim3l board (Amlogic SM1)
> leads to the following splat:
>
> [ 13.557138] WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
> [ 13.587485] ip/456 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
> [ 13.625922] ffff000059908cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq+0xf8/0x8d8
> [ 13.632273] which would create a new lock dependency:
> [ 13.637272] (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (&ctl->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
> [ 13.644209]
> [ 13.644209] but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock:
> [ 13.654122] (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}
> [ 13.654125]
> [ 13.654125] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at:
> [ 13.664759] lock_acquire+0xec/0x368
> [ 13.666926] _raw_spin_lock+0x60/0x88
> [ 13.669979] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x30/0x178
> [ 13.674082] generic_handle_irq+0x38/0x50
> [ 13.678098] __handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xc8
> [ 13.682209] gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xb0
> [ 13.685872] el1_irq+0xd0/0x180
> [ 13.689010] arch_cpu_idle+0x40/0x220
> [ 13.692732] default_idle_call+0x54/0x60
> [ 13.696677] do_idle+0x23c/0x2e8
> [ 13.699903] cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x50
> [ 13.703852] rest_init+0x1e0/0x2b4
> [ 13.707301] arch_call_rest_init+0x18/0x24
> [ 13.711449] start_kernel+0x4ec/0x51c
> [ 13.715167]
> [ 13.715167] to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
> [ 13.722426] (&ctl->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
> [ 13.722430]
> [ 13.722430] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
> [ 13.732319] ...
> [ 13.732324] lock_acquire+0xec/0x368
> [ 13.735985] _raw_spin_lock+0x60/0x88
> [ 13.739452] meson_gpio_irq_domain_alloc+0xcc/0x290
> [ 13.744392] irq_domain_alloc_irqs_hierarchy+0x24/0x60
> [ 13.749586] __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x160/0x2f0
> [ 13.754254] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0x118/0x320
> [ 13.759073] irq_create_of_mapping+0x78/0xa0
> [ 13.763360] of_irq_get+0x6c/0x80
> [ 13.766701] of_mdiobus_register_phy+0x10c/0x238 [of_mdio]
> [ 13.772227] of_mdiobus_register+0x158/0x380 [of_mdio]
> [ 13.777388] mdio_mux_init+0x180/0x2e8 [mdio_mux]
> [ 13.782128] g12a_mdio_mux_probe+0x290/0x398 [mdio_mux_meson_g12a]
> [ 13.788349] platform_drv_probe+0x5c/0xb0
> [ 13.792379] really_probe+0xe4/0x448
> [ 13.795979] driver_probe_device+0xe8/0x140
> [ 13.800189] __device_attach_driver+0x94/0x120
> [ 13.804639] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xd8
> [ 13.808474] __device_attach+0xe4/0x168
> [ 13.812361] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28
> [ 13.816592] bus_probe_device+0xa4/0xb0
> [ 13.820430] deferred_probe_work_func+0xa8/0x100
> [ 13.825064] process_one_work+0x264/0x688
> [ 13.829088] worker_thread+0x4c/0x458
> [ 13.832768] kthread+0x154/0x158
> [ 13.836018] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> [ 13.839612]
> [ 13.839612] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 13.839612]
> [ 13.850354] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
> [ 13.850354]
> [ 13.855720] CPU0 CPU1
> [ 13.858774] ---- ----
> [ 13.863242] lock(&ctl->lock);
> [ 13.866330] local_irq_disable();
> [ 13.872233] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
> [ 13.878705] lock(&ctl->lock);
> [ 13.884297] <Interrupt>
> [ 13.886857] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
> [ 13.891014]
> [ 13.891014] *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> The issue can occur when CPU1 is doing something like irq_set_type()
> and CPU0 performing an interrupt allocation, for example. Taking
> an interrupt (like the one being reconfigured) would lead to a deadlock.
>
> A solution to this is:
>
> - Reorder the locking so that meson_gpio_irq_update_bits takes the lock
> itself at all times, instead of relying on the caller to lock or not,
> hence making the RMW sequence atomic,
>
> - Rework the critical section in meson_gpio_irq_request_channel to only
> cover the allocation itself, and let the gpio_irq_sel_pin callback
> deal with its own locking if required,
>
> - Take the private spin-lock with interrupts disabled at all times
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
> index ccc7f823911b..bc7aebcc96e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-meson-gpio.c
> @@ -144,12 +144,17 @@ struct meson_gpio_irq_controller {
> static void meson_gpio_irq_update_bits(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl,
> unsigned int reg, u32 mask, u32 val)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> u32 tmp;
>
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctl->lock, flags);
> +
> tmp = readl_relaxed(ctl->base + reg);
> tmp &= ~mask;
> tmp |= val;
> writel_relaxed(tmp, ctl->base + reg);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctl->lock, flags);
> }
>
> static void meson_gpio_irq_init_dummy(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl)
> @@ -196,14 +201,15 @@ meson_gpio_irq_request_channel(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl,
> unsigned long hwirq,
> u32 **channel_hwirq)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> unsigned int idx;
>
> - spin_lock(&ctl->lock);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctl->lock, flags);
>
> /* Find a free channel */
> idx = find_first_zero_bit(ctl->channel_map, NUM_CHANNEL);
> if (idx >= NUM_CHANNEL) {
> - spin_unlock(&ctl->lock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctl->lock, flags);
> pr_err("No channel available\n");
> return -ENOSPC;
> }
> @@ -211,6 +217,8 @@ meson_gpio_irq_request_channel(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl,
> /* Mark the channel as used */
> set_bit(idx, ctl->channel_map);
>
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctl->lock, flags);
> +
> /*
> * Setup the mux of the channel to route the signal of the pad
> * to the appropriate input of the GIC
> @@ -225,8 +233,6 @@ meson_gpio_irq_request_channel(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl,
> */
> *channel_hwirq = &(ctl->channel_irqs[idx]);
>
> - spin_unlock(&ctl->lock);
> -
> pr_debug("hwirq %lu assigned to channel %d - irq %u\n",
> hwirq, idx, **channel_hwirq);
>
> @@ -287,13 +293,9 @@ static int meson_gpio_irq_type_setup(struct meson_gpio_irq_controller *ctl,
> val |= REG_EDGE_POL_LOW(params, idx);
> }
>
> - spin_lock(&ctl->lock);
> -
> meson_gpio_irq_update_bits(ctl, REG_EDGE_POL,
> REG_EDGE_POL_MASK(params, idx), val);
>
> - spin_unlock(&ctl->lock);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists