[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c2a8679-eb90-8dd1-43f6-40ce0a842c87@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:27:17 -0600
From: shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
To: Tim Bird <tim@...d.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tbird20d@...il.com, tim.bird@...y.com, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftest: add a script to perform selftest compile tests
On 4/13/20 4:15 PM, Tim Bird wrote:
> From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...y.com>
>
> Add ksft-compile-test.sh. This is a program used to test
> cross-compilation and installation of selftest tests.
>
> See the test usage for help
>
> This program currently tests 3 scenarios out of a larger matrix
> of possibly interesting scenarios. For each scenario, it conducts
> multiple tests for correctness. This version tests:
> 1) does the test compile
Is it necessary to write this long a script? Could we just parse
the "kselftest
> 2) is the kernel source directory clean after the compile
Can you use make mrproper and see if anything needs cleaning?
> 3) does the test install operation succeed
> 4) does the test run script reference the test
>
I like the idea of being able to test, however I am not convinced
you would need a whole new script for it.
> Signed-off-by: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...y.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 6 +
> tools/testing/selftests/ksft-compile-test.sh | 567 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 573 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ksft-compile-test.sh
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index cc1d18c..a6289c7 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -9127,6 +9127,12 @@ S: Maintained
> F: tools/testing/selftests/
> F: Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest*
>
> +KERNEL SELFTEST SELFTEST
> +M: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...y.com>
> +L: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
> +S: Maintained
> +F: tools/testing/selftests/ksft-compile-test.sh
> +
Please don't add another entry to the MAINTAINERS file just
for a shell script under tools/testing/selftests
This doesn't make sense.
> KERNEL UNIT TESTING FRAMEWORK (KUnit)
> M: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> L: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ksft-compile-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/ksft-compile-test.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..e36e858
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ksft-compile-test.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,567 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR MIT
> +#
> +# ksft-compile-test.sh - test compiling Linux kernel selftests under lots of
> +# different configurations. This is used to check that cross-compilation
> +# and install works properly for a newly submitted test target, and
> +# also that changes to existing test Makefiles don't regress with regard to
> +# this functionality.
> +#
> +# Copyright 2020 Sony Corporation
> +#
> +# Here are the things that Shuah Kahn asked for on 3/6/2020
> +# 1. Cross-compilation & relocatable build support
> +# 2. Generates objects in objdir/kselftest without cluttering main objdir
> +# 3. Leave source directory clean
> +# 4. Installs correctly in objdir/kselftest/kselftest_install and adds
> +# itself to run_kselftest.sh script generated during install.
> +#
I was asking for fixes to individual tests.
> +# Would be nice to make sure other features also work:
> +# 5. can use absolute, relative, or current directory for output directory
> +# 6. can use ~ in output directory path
> +#
I do think this can be achieved with a simpler script wrapper around
existing commands and kselftest_install.sh instead of writing a whole
new shell script.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists