[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200415113522.GB16949@gnbcxd0016.gnb.st.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:35:22 +0200
From: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: <pierre-yves.mordret@...com>, <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-stm32f7: improve nack debug message
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 07:21:55PM +0100, Alain Volmat wrote:
> > From: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
> >
> > Add information on slave addr in the nack debug message.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...com>
>
> Applied to for-next, thanks! (I'd drop the __func__, though; doesn't
> add information, does it?)
In fact similar message is displayed in 2 places. One in case of master mode
isr and the other one in case of slave isr. This message is adding slave
address to the master mode isr. It only makes it more clear on first sight
but indeed displaying the slave address obviously means this is master mode.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists