[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200415133704.GG9767@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:37:04 +0200
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.6.2-rt1
On 15/04/20 13:12, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-04-08 09:00:13 [+0200], Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> Hi,
>
> > On 03/04/20 19:04, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > Dear RT folks!
> > >
> > > I'm pleased to announce the v5.6.2-rt1 patch set.
> > >
> > > Changes since v5.4.28-rt19:
> > >
> > > - Rebase to v5.6.2
> >
> > I was reviewing the new set and I couldn't find v5.4.28-rt19
> > 6dbbc833c99f ("mm: perform lru_add_drain_all() remotely"). Don't think
> > it has been squashed either.
> >
> > Am I wrong? If not, why was that left out?
>
> I was going to drop it from v5.4 but kept it last minute. I announced in
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200309171350.kjb3pdjazhxm2li2@linutronix.de
>
> that the problem it fixes is not limited to RT so we need a solution for
> both config switches. The current plan for local-locks is not to work
> cross CPU because it breaks the local_irq_save() / preempt_disable()
> replacement which is something this patch relies on.
> The worker triggered via vmstat_update() is also blocked if the user
> task runs at an elevated priority for longer time.
OK. Thanks for clarifying.
Best,
Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists