lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200415152056.GA30547@bogus>
Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:20:56 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     amirmizi6@...il.com
Cc:     Eyal.Cohen@...oton.com, jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com,
        oshrialkoby85@...il.com, alexander.steffen@...ineon.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca,
        arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, oshri.alkoby@...oton.com,
        tmaimon77@...il.com, gcwilson@...ibm.com, kgoldman@...ibm.com,
        Dan.Morav@...oton.com, oren.tanami@...oton.com,
        shmulik.hager@...oton.com, amir.mizinski@...oton.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] dt-bindings: tpm: Add YAML schema for TPM TIS I2C
 options

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 07:20:43PM +0300, amirmizi6@...il.com wrote:
> From: Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@...il.com>
> 
> Added a YAML schema to support tpm tis i2c realted dt-bindings for the I2c
> PTP based physical layer.
> 
> This patch adds the documentation for corresponding device tree bindings of
> I2C based Physical TPM.
> Refer to the 'I2C Interface Definition' section in
> 'TCG PC Client PlatformTPMProfile(PTP) Specification' publication
> for specification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@...il.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml         | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..13d7c2c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/security/tpm/tpm-tis-i2c.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: I2C PTP based TPM Device Tree Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Amir Mizinski <amirmizi6@...il.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  Device Tree Bindings for I2C based Trusted Platform Module(TPM).
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    contains:
> +      const: tcg,tpm-tis-i2c

This is not sufficient. I assume you are testing on some specific TPM 
chip.

> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupt:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  crc-checksum:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> +    description:
> +      CRC checksum enable.

Why would you not want CRC? Some chips support and some don't? If so, 
the compatible for the chip should imply that.

> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    i2c {
> +      #address-cells = <1>;
> +      #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +      tpm-tis-i2c@2e {

tpm@2e

> +        compatible = "tcg,tpm-tis-i2c";
> +        reg = <0x2e>;
> +        crc-checksum;
> +      };
> +    };
> +...
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ