[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200415164628.2dgrj4ghvtev45sy@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:46:28 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: linux-rt@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] signal: Prevent double-free of user struct
On 2020-04-07 10:54:13 [+0100], Matt Fleming wrote:
> The way user struct reference counting works changed significantly with,
>
> fda31c50292a ("signal: avoid double atomic counter increments for user accounting")
>
> Now user structs are only freed once the last pending signal is
> dequeued. Make sigqueue_free_current() follow this new convention to
> avoid freeing the user struct multiple times and triggering this
> warning:
>
> refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6794 at lib/refcount.c:288 refcount_dec_not_one+0x45/0x50
> Call Trace:
> refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave+0x16/0x60
> free_uid+0x31/0xa0
> ? schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x104/0x110
> __dequeue_signal+0x17c/0x190
> dequeue_signal+0x5a/0x1b0
> do_sigtimedwait+0x208/0x250
> __x64_sys_rt_sigtimedwait+0x6f/0xd0
> do_syscall_64+0x72/0x200
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
While all this sounds reasonable, may I ask what did you do to trigger
this?
This is v5.6 only, correct?
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists