[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5954a7e1-910e-7f48-56d3-e671b56ead74@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:48:42 -0700
From: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <frankc@...dia.com>, <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
<sakari.ailus@....fi>, <helen.koike@...labora.com>
CC: <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 6/9] media: tegra: Add Tegra210 Video input driver
On 4/15/20 10:47 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>
> On 4/15/20 10:21 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>
>> On 4/15/20 9:54 AM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/15/20 7:22 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 15.04.2020 05:57, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>>> +static int tegra_csi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct tegra_csi *csi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>>> + int err;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + err = host1x_client_unregister(&csi->client);
>>>>> + if (err < 0) {
>>>>> + dev_err(csi->dev,
>>>>> + "failed to unregister host1x client: %d\n",
>>>>> err);
>>>>> + return err;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + pm_runtime_disable(csi->dev);
>>>>> + kfree(csi);
>>>> IIRC, the driver removal is invoked on the unbinding. Hence, I'm not
>>>> sure how moving away from the resource-managed API helps here.
>>>> Could you
>>>> please explain in a more details?
>>>>
>>>> Have you tried to test this driver under KASAN? I suspect that you
>>>> just
>>>> masked the problem, instead of fixing it.
>>> Using devm_kzalloc for vi/csi structures based on prior feedback
>>> request to switch to use kzalloc all over this driver.
>>>
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> video devices lifetime is till video device nodes are released. So,
>>> v4l2 device release callback does the release of tegra channel
>>> allocation which hold video device.
>>>
>>> Below are the 3 possible cases of unbind/unload,
>>>
>>> 1. during tegra-video module unload, if v4l2 device refcnt is not 0
>>> which is the case when any of video device node handle is kept
>>> opened then unloading module will not happen and module refcnt is
>>> also non-zero and unloading tegra-video module reports module in use.
>>>
>>> 2. during tegra-video driver unbind, tegra-video driver removal will
>>> do vi/csi clients exit ops which unregisters video device allocated
>>> memory during release callback of v4l2 device. vi/csi structure
>>> allocation remains same as vi/csi driver removal will not happen in
>>> this case.
>>>
>>>
>>> 3. during direct host1x client drivers vi/csi unbind, both
>>> host1x_clients vi/csi gets unregistered, deletes host1x logical
>>> device which executes tegra-video driver removal() -> vi/csi exit()
>>> before vi/csi memory gets freed in vi/csi driver remove().
>>>
>>> So, any active streaming will stop and video devices are
>>> unregistered during direct client driver unbind prior to freeing
>>> vi/csi memory.
>>>
>>> Also vi/csi driver remove does explicit free vi/csi as its allocated
>>> with kzalloc. So not sure how using kzalloc is different to
>>> devm_kzalloc for vi/csi structure in terms of when vi/csi memory
>>> gets freed?
>>>
>>> Except for channel allocation which holds video device and as video
>>> device life time is beyond tegra-video module unbind->vi exit(),
>>> looks like we can use devm_kzalloc for vi/csi.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you please comment if you still think we need to use kzalloc
>>> rather than devm_kzalloc for vi/csi structure allocation?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Sowjanya
>>>
>> One more case is when video device node is kept opened with v4l2-ctl
>> sleep (rather than streaming), where it will keep device node open
>> for specified time and if direct vi client driver unbind happens then
>> vi driver remove() will free vi memory before v4l2 device release
>> happens.
>>
>> But I don't see any crash or errors with this case.
>>
>> Also if we allow direct client driver unbind, then vi structure
>> memory lifetime should also be till v4l2 device release happens.
>>
>> But we can free vi in v4l2 device release callback as in case when
>> device node is not kept opened, video device release happens
>> immediate and we cant free vi that early.
>
> typo fix:
>
> But we can't free vi structure memory allocation in v4l2 device
> release callback as in case when device node is not kept opened,
> device release happens immediate and we can't free vi structure memory
> that early.
>
>>
>> Hans/Thierry, Can you please comment on this case?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Sowjanya
>>
Also, Can you please help explain on cases where we do/need direct
host1x clients vi/csi drivers unbind?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists