lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:20:07 -0700
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] of: property: Fix create device links for all
 child-supplier dependencies

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:06 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
<nsaenzjulienne@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Upon adding a new platform device we scan its properties and its
> children's properties in order to create a consumer/supplier
> relationship between the device and the property supplier.
>
> That said, it's possible for some of the node's children to be disabled,
> which will create links that'll never be fulfilled.
>
> To get around this, use the for_each_available_child_of_node() function
> instead of for_each_available_node() when iterating over the node's
> children.
>
> Fixes: d4387cd11741 ("of: property: Create device links for all child-supplier depencencies")
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> ---
>  drivers/of/property.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index b4916dcc9e725..a8c2b13521b27 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ static int of_link_to_suppliers(struct device *dev,
>                 if (of_link_property(dev, con_np, p->name))
>                         ret = -ENODEV;
>
> -       for_each_child_of_node(con_np, child)
> +       for_each_available_child_of_node(con_np, child)
>                 if (of_link_to_suppliers(dev, child) && !ret)
>                         ret = -EAGAIN;

Thanks. Good catch. I have plenty of disabled devices in my test
platform. But I guess I never ran into this scenario.

Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>

-Saravana

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ