[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200415184937.32373-2-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:49:37 +0100
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Eiichi Tsukata <devel@...ukata.com>,
Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] cpu: Add annotation inside clear_tasks_mm_cpumask()
Sparse reports a warning
warning: context imbalance in clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() - different lock contexts for basic block
The root cause is the missing annotation inside clear_tasks_mm_cpumask()
Add the missing __acquire(&t->alloc_lock) annotation.
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
---
kernel/cpu.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index 9c706af713fb..d8c452a8dd09 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -834,6 +834,7 @@ void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu)
t = find_lock_task_mm(p);
if (!t)
continue;
+ __acquire(&t->alloc_lock);
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(t->mm));
task_unlock(t);
}
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists