linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split at91_adc_current_chan_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f13b4286c5f133e7461d59965d7f84af059c8e89.camel@analog.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:33:17 +0000
From:   "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
To:     "Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com" <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com>,
        "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>
CC:     "Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com" <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split
 at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch() helper

On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 18:45 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:22:45 +0000
> <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 13.04.2020 20:05, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:42:18 +0200
> > > Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > This change moves the logic to check if the current channel is the
> > > > touchscreen channel to a separate helper.
> > > > This reduces some code duplication, but the main intent is to re-use
> > > > this
> > > > in the next patches.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>  
> > > Eugen / Ludovic,
> > > 
> > > Have you had a chance to look at this series?  
> > 
> > Hi Jonathan,
> > 
> > Does the patch apply correctly for you ?
> 
> I haven't tried yet :)
> 

I've rebased this patchset on top of current iio/testing and it still applies.


> > I will try to test it , if I manage to apply it.
> > I can only test the ADC though because at this moment I do not have a 
> > touchscreen at disposal.
> > 
> > Meanwhile, the code looks good for me,
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>
> > 
> > By the way, I do not know if my two pending patches on this driver will 
> > conflict or not.
> 
> As this is a long term rework patch at heart, there isn't any particular
> rush as long as we don't loose it forever!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> > Eugen
> > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Jonathan
> > >   
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > This patchset continues discussion:
> > > >     
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20191023082508.17583-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com/__;!!A3Ni8CS0y2Y!ql1bYiNMPFlz1twnCCAQpiEBvpzxR_VHAPL712rWFfwy2TSKjZ2UhGBoV7-29Syny6z0yg$
> > > >  
> > > > Apologies for the delay.
> > > > 
> > > > Changelog v1 -> v2:
> > > > * added patch 'iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split
> > > > at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch()
> > > >    helper'
> > > > * renamed at91_adc_buffer_postenable() -> at91_adc_buffer_preenable()
> > > >    - at91_adc_buffer_postenable() - now just calls
> > > >      iio_triggered_buffer_postenable() if the channel isn't the
> > > > touchscreen
> > > >      channel
> > > > * renamed at91_adc_buffer_predisable() -> at91_adc_buffer_postdisable()
> > > >    - at91_adc_buffer_predisable() - now just calls
> > > >      iio_triggered_buffer_predisable() if the channel isn't the
> > > > touchscreen
> > > >      channel
> > > > 
> > > >   drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > > >   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-
> > > > sama5d2_adc.c
> > > > index a5c7771227d5..f2a74c47c768 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> > > > @@ -873,18 +873,24 @@ static int at91_adc_dma_start(struct iio_dev
> > > > *indio_dev)
> > > >        return 0;
> > > >   }
> > > > 
> > > > +static bool at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > > +
> > > > +     return !!bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > +                            &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > +                            AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >   static int at91_adc_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > > >   {
> > > >        int ret;
> > > >        struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > > 
> > > >        /* check if we are enabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
> > > > */
> > > > -     if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > -                       &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > -                       AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
> > > > -             /* touchscreen enabling */
> > > > +     if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
> > > >                return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, true);
> > > > -     }
> > > > +
> > > >        /* if we are not in triggered mode, we cannot enable the buffer.
> > > > */
> > > >        if (!(indio_dev->currentmode & INDIO_ALL_TRIGGERED_MODES))
> > > >                return -EINVAL;
> > > > @@ -906,12 +912,9 @@ static int at91_adc_buffer_predisable(struct
> > > > iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > > >        u8 bit;
> > > > 
> > > >        /* check if we are disabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
> > > > */
> > > > -     if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > -                       &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > -                       AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
> > > > -             /* touchscreen disable */
> > > > +     if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
> > > >                return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, false);
> > > > -     }
> > > > +
> > > >        /* if we are not in triggered mode, nothing to do here */
> > > >        if (!(indio_dev->currentmode & INDIO_ALL_TRIGGERED_MODES))
> > > >                return -EINVAL;
> > > > @@ -1886,14 +1889,10 @@ static __maybe_unused int at91_adc_resume(struct
> > > > device *dev)
> > > >                return 0;
> > > > 
> > > >        /* check if we are enabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
> > > > */
> > > > -     if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > -                       &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > -                       AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
> > > > -             /* touchscreen enabling */
> > > > +     if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
> > > >                return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, true);
> > > > -     } else {
> > > > +     else
> > > >                return at91_adc_configure_trigger(st->trig, true);
> > > > -     }
> > > > 
> > > >        /* not needed but more explicit */
> > > >        return 0;  
> > >