[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200415114536.GB910@ninjato>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:45:36 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] NVIDIA Tegra I2C synchronization correction
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:12:15PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently I found a way to reliably reproduce I2C timeouts that happen due
> to improper synchronizations made by the I2C driver. It's quite easy to
> reproduce the problem when memory is running on a lower freq + there is
> some memory activity + CPU could get busy for a significant time. This
> is the case when KASAN is enabled and CPU is busy while accessing FS via
> NFS. This small series addresses the found problems.
>
> Changelog:
>
> v2: - The "Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time" patch
> now preserves the old behavior where completion is checked after
> disabling the interrupt, preventing potential race-condition of
> the completion awaiting vs interrupt syncing.
>
> Dmitry Osipenko (2):
> i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
> i2c: tegra: Synchronize DMA before termination
Patches look good to me. I tend to apply them to for-current instead of
for-next because they are fixing issues. Even a stable tag?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists