linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: rohm-bdXXX - switch to use i2c probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <abcb3356c78758cb176947fba7b2f291d63055a3.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:44:36 +0000
From:   "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     "mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: rohm-bdXXX - switch to use i2c probe_new


On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 12:04 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > Hello Lee,
> > 
> > On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 10:50 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > ROHM BD70528 and BD718x7 drivers do not utilize the I2C id.
> > > > Do the trivial conversion and make them to use probe_new
> > > > instead of probe.
> > > 
> > > Not sure I understand the purpose of the patch.
> > > 
> > > The only reason to switch to probe_new is to aid the removal of
> > > the
> > > compulsory I2C tables.  However, neither of these drivers have
> > > them.
> > 
> > Maybe I have misunderstood the probe_new. My understanding was that
> > the
> > probe_new is what should become the standard - Eg. eventually all
> > I2C
> > drivers would use probe which is not getting the ID tables as
> > argument
> > - and the old probe could be removed. Thus I thought conversion of
> > probe to probe_new would be required in order to get rid of the old
> > probe. I think I got this understanding when I submitted driver for
> > BD71828 - and I think it was you who suggested me to switch to
> > probe_new as 'id' was unused. But if please just drop this patch if
> > this change is not needed!
> 
> Some I2C drivers do make use of 'id' though.  So the standard probe
> will probably never go away.  I wrote probe_new for drivers that
> wished to omit the I2C table.  A better use of your time would be to
> go through the original probe users and figure out which I2C tables
> can be removed.

Right. Unfortunately I don't have problems with excessive amounts of
free time xD I did this probe-conversion for bd718x7 because that
driver is originally written by me - and I try to contribute on
maintenance of stuff I have pushed on your and other maintainer's
shoulders :)

And as I said - if the usage of probe is just as fine as usage of
probe_new - then please just drop this patch :)

Thanks for clarifying this!

Best Regards
    Matti