| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20200416131332.101752812@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:23:51 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 137/232] btrfs: Dont submit any btree write bio if the fs has errors
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
commit b3ff8f1d380e65dddd772542aa9bff6c86bf715a upstream.
[BUG]
There is a fuzzed image which could cause KASAN report at unmount time.
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_queue_work+0x2c1/0x390
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888067cf6848 by task umount/1922
CPU: 0 PID: 1922 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.0.21 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x5b/0x8b
print_address_description+0x70/0x280
kasan_report+0x13a/0x19b
btrfs_queue_work+0x2c1/0x390
btrfs_wq_submit_bio+0x1cd/0x240
btree_submit_bio_hook+0x18c/0x2a0
submit_one_bio+0x1be/0x320
flush_write_bio.isra.41+0x2c/0x70
btree_write_cache_pages+0x3bb/0x7f0
do_writepages+0x5c/0x130
__writeback_single_inode+0xa3/0x9a0
writeback_single_inode+0x23d/0x390
write_inode_now+0x1b5/0x280
iput+0x2ef/0x600
close_ctree+0x341/0x750
generic_shutdown_super+0x126/0x370
kill_anon_super+0x31/0x50
btrfs_kill_super+0x36/0x2b0
deactivate_locked_super+0x80/0xc0
deactivate_super+0x13c/0x150
cleanup_mnt+0x9a/0x130
task_work_run+0x11a/0x1b0
exit_to_usermode_loop+0x107/0x130
do_syscall_64+0x1e5/0x280
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[CAUSE]
The fuzzed image has a completely screwd up extent tree:
leaf 29421568 gen 8 total ptrs 6 free space 3587 owner EXTENT_TREE
refs 2 lock (w:0 r:0 bw:0 br:0 sw:0 sr:0) lock_owner 0 current 5938
item 0 key (12587008 168 4096) itemoff 3942 itemsize 53
extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 1
ref#0: extent data backref root 5 objectid 259 offset 0 count 1
item 1 key (12591104 168 8192) itemoff 3889 itemsize 53
extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 1
ref#0: extent data backref root 5 objectid 271 offset 0 count 1
item 2 key (12599296 168 4096) itemoff 3836 itemsize 53
extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 1
ref#0: extent data backref root 5 objectid 259 offset 4096 count 1
item 3 key (29360128 169 0) itemoff 3803 itemsize 33
extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 2
ref#0: tree block backref root 5
item 4 key (29368320 169 1) itemoff 3770 itemsize 33
extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 2
ref#0: tree block backref root 5
item 5 key (29372416 169 0) itemoff 3737 itemsize 33
extent refs 1 gen 9 flags 2
ref#0: tree block backref root 5
Note that leaf 29421568 doesn't have its backref in the extent tree.
Thus extent allocator can re-allocate leaf 29421568 for other trees.
In short, the bug is caused by:
- Existing tree block gets allocated to log tree
This got its generation bumped.
- Log tree balance cleaned dirty bit of offending tree block
It will not be written back to disk, thus no WRITTEN flag.
- Original owner of the tree block gets COWed
Since the tree block has higher transid, no WRITTEN flag, it's reused,
and not traced by transaction::dirty_pages.
- Transaction aborted
Tree blocks get cleaned according to transaction::dirty_pages. But the
offending tree block is not recorded at all.
- Filesystem unmount
All pages are assumed to be are clean, destroying all workqueue, then
call iput(btree_inode).
But offending tree block is still dirty, which triggers writeback, and
causes use-after-free bug.
The detailed sequence looks like this:
- Initial status
eb: 29421568, header=WRITTEN bflags_dirty=0, page_dirty=0, gen=8,
not traced by any dirty extent_iot_tree.
- New tree block is allocated
Since there is no backref for 29421568, it's re-allocated as new tree
block.
Keep in mind that tree block 29421568 is still referred by extent
tree.
- Tree block 29421568 is filled for log tree
eb: 29421568, header=0 bflags_dirty=1, page_dirty=1, gen=9 << (gen bumped)
traced by btrfs_root::dirty_log_pages
- Some log tree operations
Since the fs is using node size 4096, the log tree can easily go a
level higher.
- Log tree needs balance
Tree block 29421568 gets all its content pushed to right, thus now
it is empty, and we don't need it.
btrfs_clean_tree_block() from __push_leaf_right() get called.
eb: 29421568, header=0 bflags_dirty=0, page_dirty=0, gen=9
traced by btrfs_root::dirty_log_pages
- Log tree write back
btree_write_cache_pages() goes through dirty pages ranges, but since
page of tree block 29421568 gets cleaned already, it's not written
back to disk. Thus it doesn't have WRITTEN bit set.
But ranges in dirty_log_pages are cleared.
eb: 29421568, header=0 bflags_dirty=0, page_dirty=0, gen=9
not traced by any dirty extent_iot_tree.
- Extent tree update when committing transaction
Since tree block 29421568 has transid equal to running trans, and has
no WRITTEN bit, should_cow_block() will use it directly without adding
it to btrfs_transaction::dirty_pages.
eb: 29421568, header=0 bflags_dirty=1, page_dirty=1, gen=9
not traced by any dirty extent_iot_tree.
At this stage, we're doomed. We have a dirty eb not tracked by any
extent io tree.
- Transaction gets aborted due to corrupted extent tree
Btrfs cleans up dirty pages according to transaction::dirty_pages and
btrfs_root::dirty_log_pages.
But since tree block 29421568 is not tracked by neither of them, it's
still dirty.
eb: 29421568, header=0 bflags_dirty=1, page_dirty=1, gen=9
not traced by any dirty extent_iot_tree.
- Filesystem unmount
Since all cleanup is assumed to be done, all workqueus are destroyed.
Then iput(btree_inode) is called, expecting no dirty pages.
But tree 29421568 is still dirty, thus triggering writeback.
Since all workqueues are already freed, we cause use-after-free.
This shows us that, log tree blocks + bad extent tree can cause wild
dirty pages.
[FIX]
To fix the problem, don't submit any btree write bio if the filesytem
has any error. This is the last safe net, just in case other cleanup
haven't caught catch it.
Link: https://github.com/bobfuzzer/CVE/tree/master/CVE-2019-19377
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -3928,6 +3928,7 @@ int btree_write_cache_pages(struct addre
.extent_locked = 0,
.sync_io = wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL,
};
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = BTRFS_I(mapping->host)->root->fs_info;
int ret = 0;
int done = 0;
int nr_to_write_done = 0;
@@ -4041,7 +4042,39 @@ retry:
end_write_bio(&epd, ret);
return ret;
}
- ret = flush_write_bio(&epd);
+ /*
+ * If something went wrong, don't allow any metadata write bio to be
+ * submitted.
+ *
+ * This would prevent use-after-free if we had dirty pages not
+ * cleaned up, which can still happen by fuzzed images.
+ *
+ * - Bad extent tree
+ * Allowing existing tree block to be allocated for other trees.
+ *
+ * - Log tree operations
+ * Exiting tree blocks get allocated to log tree, bumps its
+ * generation, then get cleaned in tree re-balance.
+ * Such tree block will not be written back, since it's clean,
+ * thus no WRITTEN flag set.
+ * And after log writes back, this tree block is not traced by
+ * any dirty extent_io_tree.
+ *
+ * - Offending tree block gets re-dirtied from its original owner
+ * Since it has bumped generation, no WRITTEN flag, it can be
+ * reused without COWing. This tree block will not be traced
+ * by btrfs_transaction::dirty_pages.
+ *
+ * Now such dirty tree block will not be cleaned by any dirty
+ * extent io tree. Thus we don't want to submit such wild eb
+ * if the fs already has error.
+ */
+ if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR, &fs_info->fs_state)) {
+ ret = flush_write_bio(&epd);
+ } else {
+ ret = -EUCLEAN;
+ end_write_bio(&epd, ret);
+ }
return ret;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists