[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200416131353.247729120@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:25:07 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...el.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.6 218/254] drm/i915/gt: Treat idling as a RPS downclock event
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
commit 98479ada421a8fd2123b98efd398a6f1379307ab upstream.
If we park/unpark faster than we can respond to RPS events, we never
will process a downclock event after expiring a waitboost, and thus we
will forever restart the GPU at max clocks even if the workload switches
and doesn't justify full power.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1500
Fixes: 3e7abf814193 ("drm/i915: Extract GT render power state management")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...el.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...el.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200322163225.28791-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v5.5+
(cherry picked from commit 21abf0bf168dffff1192e0f072af1dc74ae1ff0e)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -763,6 +763,19 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rp
intel_uncore_forcewake_get(rps_to_uncore(rps), FORCEWAKE_MEDIA);
rps_set(rps, rps->idle_freq, false);
intel_uncore_forcewake_put(rps_to_uncore(rps), FORCEWAKE_MEDIA);
+
+ /*
+ * Since we will try and restart from the previously requested
+ * frequency on unparking, treat this idle point as a downclock
+ * interrupt and reduce the frequency for resume. If we park/unpark
+ * more frequently than the rps worker can run, we will not respond
+ * to any EI and never see a change in frequency.
+ *
+ * (Note we accommodate Cherryview's limitation of only using an
+ * even bin by applying it to all.)
+ */
+ rps->cur_freq =
+ max_t(int, round_down(rps->cur_freq - 1, 2), rps->min_freq);
}
void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists