lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 Apr 2020 20:18:43 +0530
From:   Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/4] mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY host
 capability

Hi Ulf,

On 4/16/2020 5:46 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 at 17:54, Veerabhadrarao Badiganti
> <vbadigan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> sdhci-msm controller requires the R1B response for commands that
>> has this response associated with them.
>>
>> So enable MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY capability.
> I assume this potentially should be considered as fix and tagged for stable?
Yes Stable flag can be applied to this.

Patch with MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY cap also needed besides this.
Shall I push V2 with stable flag?

> Another question, if there is there an upper limit of the busy timeout
> in the HW (cmd->busy_timeout) or does the driver use a software
> timeout that is adjustable?

The max supported h.w busy timeout value on qcom h/w 21sec.

> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
>> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> index 013dcea..d826e9b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
>> @@ -2088,6 +2088,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>          }
>>
>>          msm_host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY;
>> +       msm_host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY;
>>
>>          pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
>>          pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
>> --
>> Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists