linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 104/232] sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200416131328.097402688@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:23:18 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 104/232] sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning

From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>

commit fe61468b2cbc2b7ce5f8d3bf32ae5001d4c434e9 upstream.

When a cfs rq is throttled, the latter and its child are removed from the
leaf list but their nr_running is not changed which includes staying higher
than 1. When a task is enqueued in this throttled branch, the cfs rqs must
be added back in order to ensure correct ordering in the list but this can
only happens if nr_running == 1.
When cfs bandwidth is used, we call unconditionnaly list_add_leaf_cfs_rq()
when enqueuing an entity to make sure that the complete branch will be
added.

Similarly unthrottle_cfs_rq() can stop adding cfs in the list when a parent
is throttled. Iterate the remaining entity to ensure that the complete
branch will be added in the list.

Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org #v5.1+
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200306135257.25044-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3927,6 +3927,7 @@ static inline void check_schedstat_requi
 #endif
 }
 
+static inline bool cfs_bandwidth_used(void);
 
 /*
  * MIGRATION
@@ -4005,10 +4006,16 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
 		__enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
 	se->on_rq = 1;
 
-	if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1) {
+	/*
+	 * When bandwidth control is enabled, cfs might have been removed
+	 * because of a parent been throttled but cfs->nr_running > 1. Try to
+	 * add it unconditionnally.
+	 */
+	if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 || cfs_bandwidth_used())
 		list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+
+	if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
 		check_enqueue_throttle(cfs_rq);
-	}
 }
 
 static void __clear_buddies_last(struct sched_entity *se)
@@ -4589,11 +4596,22 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cf
 			break;
 	}
 
-	assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq);
-
 	if (!se)
 		add_nr_running(rq, task_delta);
 
+	/*
+	 * The cfs_rq_throttled() breaks in the above iteration can result in
+	 * incomplete leaf list maintenance, resulting in triggering the
+	 * assertion below.
+	 */
+	for_each_sched_entity(se) {
+		cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+
+		list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+	}
+
+	assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq);
+
 	/* Determine whether we need to wake up potentially idle CPU: */
 	if (rq->curr == rq->idle && rq->cfs.nr_running)
 		resched_curr(rq);