[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a77ca940-afe4-a94a-2698-6cda0f95ba5c@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 15:44:06 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: VMX: Unionize vcpu_vmx.exit_reason
On 15/04/20 19:55, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Convert the exit_reason field in struct vcpu_vmx from a vanilla u32 to a
> union, (ab)using the union to provide access to the basic exit reason and
> flags.
>
> There is a fairly substantial delta relative to v1, as I ran with Vitaly's
> suggestion to split nested_vmx_exit_reflected() into VM-Fail, "L0 wants"
> and "L1 wants", and move the tracepoint into nested_vmx_reflect_vmexit().
> IMO, this yields cleaner and more understandable code overall, and helps
> eliminate caching the basic exit reason (see below) by avoiding large
> functions that repeatedly query the basic exit reason. The refactoring
> isn't strictly related to making exit_reason a union, but the code would
> conflict horribly and the end code nicely demonstrates the value of using
> a union for the exit reason.
>
> There are three motivating factors for making exit_reason a union:
>
> - Help avoid bugs where a basic exit reason is compared against the full
> exit reason, e.g. there have been two bugs where MCE_DURING_VMENTRY
> was incorrectly compared against the full exit reason.
>
> - Clarify the intent of related flows, e.g. exit_reason is used for both
> "basic exit reason" and "full exit reason", and it's not always clear
> which of the two is intended without a fair bit of digging.
>
> - Prepare for future Intel features, e.g. SGX, that add new exit flags
> that are less restricted than FAILED_VMENTRY, i.e. can be set on what
> is otherwise a standard VM-Exit.
>
> v2:
> - Don't snapshot the basic exit reason, i.e. either use vmx->exit_reason
> directly or snapshot the whole thing. The resulting code is similar
> to Xiaoyao's original patch, e.g. vmx_handle_exit() now uses
> "exit_reason.basic" instead of "exit_reason" to reference the basic
> exit reason.
> - Split nested_vmx_exit_reflected() into VM-Fail, "L0 wants" and "L1
> wants", and move the tracepoint into nested_vmx_reflect_vmexit().
> [Vitaly]
> - Use a "union vmx_exit_reason exit_reason" to handle a consistency
> check VM-Exit on VM-Enter in nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode() to avoid
> some implicit casting shenanigans. [Vitaly]
> - Collect tags. [Vitaly]
>
> v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200312184521.24579-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com
For now I committed only patches 1-9, just to limit the conflicts with
the other series. I would like to understand how you think the
conflicts should be fixed with the union.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists