[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKz_xw0+gKBM1jp-Avnd+4j9vSxUix67RZBX-NNbStb0+ri4+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:46:39 +1000
From: Evan Benn <evanbenn@...omium.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Xingyu Chen <xingyu.chen@...ogic.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
LINUX-WATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>,
Yonghui Yu <yonghui.yu@...ogic.com>,
"open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a watchdog driver that uses ARM Secure Monitor Calls.
Thanks Xingyu,
Can anyone provide advice about making SMCWD_FUNC_ID a device tree
param directly, vs using the compatible to select from a table.
Please note get_timeleft erroneously returns res.a0 instead of res.a1
in this version.
Evan
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:12 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 03:29:29PM -0700, Julius Werner wrote:
> > > In addition, It looks more reasonable to use the "msec" as the unit of
> > > timeout parameter for the ATF fw interface with SMCWD_SET_TIMEOUT:
> > >
> > > - The fw interface will compatible with the uboot generic watchdog
> > > interface at [0], and there is no need to convert timeout from msec
> > > to sec.
> >
> > I think we're trying hard to keep this compatible to a Trusted
> > Firmware counterpart that we have already shipped, so we would prefer
> > to keep it at seconds if possible. That's what the Linux watchdog core
> > uses as well after all, so it just seems natural. I don't really see
> > how what U-Boot does would have anything to do with this.
> >
> > > - Some vendor's watchdog may be not support the "wdt_trigger_reset"
> > > reset operation, but they can use the method below to reset the system
> > > by the watchdog right now.
> > >
> > > watchdog_set_time(1); //1ms
> > > watchdog_enable();
> >
> > They can still do that but they should do that on the Trusted Firmware
> > side. Emulating a missing reset functionality should be handled by the
> > hardware abstraction layer (in this case Trusted Firmware), not at the
> > Linux API level. So Linux would still send a PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET SMC,
> > but then Trusted Firmware can choose to implement that by setting the
> > watchdog to the smallest possible timeout (which it can because it's
> > accessing it directly, not through this SMC interface) and letting it
> > expire.
>
> I agree. Using a watchdog to implement reset functionality is always a
> means of last resort and should be avoided if possible.
>
> Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists