[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0adafade-7228-58d3-3db0-b06325712468@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:57:16 +0800
From: Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kishon@...com, robh@...nel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...el.com,
cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, chuanhua.lei@...ux.intel.com,
qi-ming.wu@...el.com, yixin.zhu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] mfd: syscon: Add fwnode_to_regmap
On 4/15/2020 5:31 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020, Dilip Kota wrote:
>
>> Traverse regmap handle entry from firmware node handle.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> Changes on v5:
>> No changes
>>
>> Changes on v4:
>> No changes
>>
>> drivers/mfd/syscon.c | 8 ++++++++
>> include/linux/mfd/syscon.h | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> I think you'll find it very difficult to have a patch merged if you do
> not send it to any Maintainers of the associated subsystem(s).
Sorry, i completely missed adding the system configuration Maintainers.
I was completely thinking about the PHY driver( in doing changes and
upgrades) while sending the patches.
I have noticed it, and already sent v6 patch series by adding you and
arnd@...db.de
"[RESEND PATCH v6 0/4] Add Intel ComboPhy driver"
Snippet from the mail.
"Re-sending the patches v6 by adding the system configuration Maintainers,
which i missed to add them."
Regards,
Dilip
>
> Did you use `scripts/get_maintainer.pl` at all?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists