[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TY1PR01MB157830C8558819413762A95D90D80@TY1PR01MB1578.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 07:45:47 +0000
From: "Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
<Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
To: 'Namjae Jeon' <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
CC: "Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
<Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,
"Motai.Hirotaka@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
<Motai.Hirotaka@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,
'Sungjong Seo' <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'Matthew Wilcox' <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] exfat: replace 'time_ms' with 'time_10ms'
> > When using '100' for the divisor, I think cs (centi-sec) is easier to
> > understand than 10ms.
> > Which do you prefer, time_10ms or time_cs?
> Can you resend the patch again after changing to time_cs ?
Of course.
And, rebase to your for-next.
BR
---
Kohada Tetsuhiro <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists