linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] exfat: replace 'time_ms' with 'time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Apr 2020 07:45:47 +0000
From:   "Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" 
        <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
To:     'Namjae Jeon' <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
CC:     "Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" 
        <Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,
        "Motai.Hirotaka@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" 
        <Motai.Hirotaka@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,
        'Sungjong Seo' <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        'Matthew Wilcox' <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] exfat: replace 'time_ms' with 'time_10ms'

> > When using '100' for the divisor, I think cs (centi-sec) is easier to
> > understand than 10ms.
> > Which do you prefer, time_10ms or time_cs?
> Can you resend the patch again after changing to time_cs ?

Of course.
And, rebase to your for-next.


BR
---
Kohada Tetsuhiro <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>