[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0bed9f1a-400d-d9a9-aeb4-de1dd9ccbb45@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:01:20 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, tj@...nel.org,
hughd@...gle.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com,
willy@...radead.org, shakeelb@...gle.com,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
swkhack <swkhack@...il.com>,
"Potyra, Stefan" <Stefan.Potyra@...ktrobit.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] mm/lru: replace pgdat lru_lock with lruvec lock
在 2020/4/15 下午9:42, Alex Shi 写道:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> Thanks a lot for point out!
>
> Charging in __read_swap_cache_async would ask for 3 layers function arguments
> pass, that would be a bit ugly. Compare to this, could we move out the
> lru_cache add after commit_charge, like ksm copied pages?
>
> That give a bit extra non lru list time, but the page just only be used only
> after add_anon_rmap setting. Could it cause troubles?
Hi Johannes & Andrew,
Doing lru_cache_add_anon during swapin_readahead can give a very short timing
for possible page reclaiming for these few pages.
If we delay these few pages lru adding till after the vm_fault target page
get memcg charging(mem_cgroup_commit_charge) and activate, we could skip the
mem_cgroup_try_charge/commit_charge/cancel_charge process in __read_swap_cache_async().
But the cost is maximum SWAP_RA_ORDER_CEILING number pages on each cpu miss
page reclaiming in a short time. On the other hand, save the target vm_fault
page from reclaiming before activate it during that time.
Judging the lose and gain, and the example of shmem/ksm copied pages, I believe
it's fine to delay lru list adding till activate the target swapin page.
Any comments are appreciated!
Thanks
Alex
>
> I tried to track down the reason of lru_cache_add here, but no explanation
> till first git kernel commit.
>
> Thanks
> Alex
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists